Clearing the ground ...

“He who alone possesses immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light,
whom none among human beings has seen or can see,
to whom the honour and might of the Age; amen.”
1 Timothy 6:16​

The 9th century Irishman – Johannes Scottus Eriugena left a timeless masterpiece called Periphysion, meaning 'On Nature' in Greek. The category of nature for Eriugena is defined as everything that is and is not. Basically, all of reality. The work divides this nature into four essential categories, related to the attribute of being, either creating or created.
1: that which creates and is not created – the cataphatic God, which gives rise to 2 and 3;
2: that which is created and creates – the primordial causes / Sophia - Logos / Platonic forms;
3: that which is created and does not create – the material world;
4: that which is not created and does not create – the apophatic God, to which everything returns.

What Eriugena insists throughout this work is that there is only God. There is nothing that is not God. God is the essence of all things. Like any good Neoplatonist, everything proceeds from God, the One, as an unfolding, but is then destined to return, like the exhale and inhale of the breath.

This got Eriugena accused of pantheism, or pandeism, or perhaps panentheism, but really his was a monistic theology firmly rooted in the Christian philosophical tradition.

For Eriugena, God is understood in a deeply apophatic way. We cannot know, say, or understand anything about what God is; in the apophasis of Dionysius the pseudoAreopagite (St Denys, to the Orthodox and here) God dwells in utter darkness:

"Supernal Triad, Deity above all essence, knowledge and goodness; Guide of Christians to Divine Wisdom; direct our path to the ultimate summit of your mystical knowledge, most incomprehensible, most luminous and most exalted, where the pure, absolute and immutable mysteries of theology are veiled in the dazzling obscurity of the secret Silence, outshining all brilliance with the intensity of their Darkness, and surcharging our blinded intellects with the utterly impalpable and invisible fairness of glories surpassing all beauty."
(St Denys, The Mystical Theology, I, 1)

"Therefore the Divine Goodness which is called 'Nothing' for the reason that, beyond all things that are and that are not, it is found in no essence, descends from the negation of all essences into the affirmation of the essence of the whole universe; from itself into itself, as though from nothing into something, from non-essentiality into essentiality, from formlessness into innumerable forms and species. For its first progression into the primordial causes in which it is made is spoken of by Scripture as formless matter: matter because it is the beginning of the essence of things ; formless because it comes nearest to the formlessness of the Divine Wisdom.”
(Johannes Scottus Eriugena, Periphyseon, III, 681C, p308, O’Meara translation, Bellarmin & Dunbarton Oaks, 1987)

We can say that God is, but not what God is, because God isn't a 'something' at all. No category of genus or species, place or time, quality or quantity, or any other mode of existence, can be attributed to Him. Even 'being' itself is not fully appropriate, as God remains beyond 'being' and 'non-being'.

But God can be knowable to the intellect, and simultaneously unknowable, in the sense that we can make affirmative 'cataphatic' statements about God – such as used in Holy Scripture – and also negative 'apophatic' ones, without contradiction, moreover we can do so in a way that they complement each other.
 
So if this god-thing is undefineable, why call it God, with all the cultural baggage, the wealth of preconceptions that carries?
 
For Eriugena, the world of creation is nothing but God's manifestation of Himself to Himself. It is a theophany, literally 'a showing of God'. The unknowable and the ineffable becoming something, while in Itself never compromising Its perfection and immutability.

Again, for Eriugena, all creation is a burning bush. Whatever is experienced in the world of goodness and beauty; a blooming flower, the bark of a fox in the darkness, the warmth of the sun on your skin ... it’s all God showing Himself.

“For the motion of the supreme and three-fold and only true Goodness, which in Itself is immutable, and the multiplication of Its simplicity, and Its unexhausted diffusion from Itself in Itself back to Itself, is the cause of all things, indeed is all things. For if the understanding of all things is all things, and It alone understands all things, then It alone is all things. For that alone is the gnostic power which knows all things before they are and does not know all things outside Itself because outside It there is nothing. But It possesses all things within Itself. For It encircles all things and there is nothing within It but what in so far as It is is not Itself for It alone truly is. For the other things that are said to be are Its theophanes which likewise have their true subsistence in It. Therefore, God is everything that truly is because He himself makes all things and is made in all things."
(ibid. III, 633a, p249-250)

There are some important nuances here.

To say that all things are the theophanies or manifestations of God is not to say that they are identical to God or the same as God as such. God and His ultimate reality remains transcendent in His apophatism and we can never know anything truly about it. Creator remains creator and creation remains created. The two never truly collapse into each other fully, as made explicit in the four-fold division.

So we can't really apply a simplistic category like 'pantheism' to Eriugena, even though many, historically, have wanted to do.

From the perspective that God is, creation can be said to not be or to have no being. But from the perspective of creation, God is said to be non-being. What this does is affirm the essential difference between God and Divine Theophany. God is not a burning bush, any more than a pillar of smoke or a column of fire; God is not a door, is not a loaf, is not a vine. God is made visible and manifest as a theophany – both in the mind and to the senses. But God's own actuality always remains beyond, in the Divine Darkness, in apophatic nothingness.

Deirdre Carabine says:
"The unity of God and creature is a strong theme in the Periphyseon, although the division of nature itself serves to maintain a distinction between the two and is confirmation of the fact that God and creature do not exist on the same ontological level. Creation is not something apart from God, but is ... the ontological participation of the creature in God."
(Deirdre Carabine, Johannes Scottus Eriugena, OUP, 2000, p48.)

"For in him we live and move and are" (Acts 17:28).

Eriugena points to this in some of the most dialectical passages in the Periphyseon:
"For everything that is understood and sensed is nothing else but the apparition of what is not apparent, the manifestation of the hidden, the affirmation of the negated, the comprehension of the incomprehensible, [the utterance of the unutterable, the access to the inaccessible,] the understanding of the unintelligible, the body of the bodiless, the essence of the superessential, the form of the formless, the measure of the measureless, the number of the unnumbered, the weight of the weightless, the materialisation of the spiritual, the visibility of the invisible."
(Periphyseon Ill 633A p249, 678C p305.)
 
So if this god-thing is undefineable ...
From the apophatic viewpoint. From the cataphatic it can be. Scripture offers direct statements.

... why call it God, with all the cultural baggage, the wealth of preconceptions that carries?
Because inventing another term will just start that process all over again?

In analogous terms, moving forward along the spiritual path is to tackle an incline. If one were to look back, the trace of one's ascent would be marked by discarded baggage along the way. If one looked from side to side, one would appreciate an increasingly narrow and yet ill-defined path flanked by precipitous slopes to either side, where the ground of our preconceptions crumbles as we walk.

The 'cultural baggage' and 'wealth of preconceptions' is a distraction and a luxury.
 
Back
Top