Are you stupid
Quite the OPPOSITE! Nature is DEvolving, not Evolving!!!
We are NOT taller than the NEPHILIM/Neandrethals.
Animals were MUCH BIGGER before the FLOOD.
Have you gone mad? CHECK THE FOSSIL RECORD! Everything, including the TREES, PLANTS, ANIMALS(Dragons/Dinosaurs, Giants)...etc.
You've really got to WAKE UP!
I'm just going to ignore Divine as it's pretty obvious the he/she/it will not listen to any counter argument, believes what he/she/it has already been told is true by other people, is totaly incapable of independant thought or reasoning and won't bother to do any reasurch or questioning of his/her/its own. Divine is a total waste of time, dna and effort and probably best ignored till he/she/it goes and crawls back under the rock it came from.I think the question is whether you are or not, Divine.
In response to your statement that "we are NOT taller than the NEPHILIM/Neandrethals." (and that's Neanderthals by the way), we are, by average, much taller.
On average, Neanderthal males stood about 1.65 m tall (just under 5' 5") and were heavily built, and muscular due to their physical activity and robust bone structure. Females were about 1.53 to 1.57 m tall (about 5'–5'2").
I would say that maybe you need to do just a tad more research.
I'm just going to ignore Divine as it's pretty obvious the he/she/it will not listen to any counter argument, believes what he/she/it has already been told is true by other people, is totaly incapable of independant thought or reasoning and won't bother to do any reasurch or questioning of his/her/its own. Divine is a total waste of time, dna and effort and probably best ignored till he/she/it goes and crawls back under the rock it came from.
I think the question is whether you are or not, Divine.
In response to your statement that "we are NOT taller than the NEPHILIM/Neandrethals." (and that's Neanderthals by the way), we are, by average, much taller.
On average, Neanderthal males stood about 1.65 m tall (just under 5' 5") and were heavily built, and muscular due to their physical activity and robust bone structure. Females were about 1.53 to 1.57 m tall (about 5'–5'2").
I would say that maybe you need to do just a tad more research.
I'm just going to ignore Divine as it's pretty obvious the he/she/it will not listen to any counter argument, believes what he/she/it has already been told is true by other people, is totaly incapable of independant thought or reasoning and won't bother to do any reasurch or questioning of his/her/its own. Divine is a total waste of time, dna and effort and probably best ignored till he/she/it goes and crawls back under the rock it came from.
Go Fish ? ( the card game or the favorite cheer at a Babylonian University )
I'm really curious as to which science books these guys have been reading. None that I've run across.
flow....
I'm just going to ignore Divine as it's pretty obvious the he/she/it will not listen to any counter argument, believes what he/she/it has already been told is true by other people, is totaly incapable of independant thought or reasoning and won't bother to do any reasurch or questioning of his/her/its own. Divine is a total waste of time, dna and effort and probably best ignored till he/she/it goes and crawls back under the rock it came from.
Actually it's a case of 'pearls before swine'... You're throwing out a load of baseless 'facts' which has no scientific backing (36ft neaderthal bones? were?when? tell me your source of information? The only sources of info you've listed so far are the Bible and a couple of religious websites. Not exactly unbiased then?) Try reading Richard Dawkins work (ignoring his anti religion stance) for a lot more information on evoulution as a first start. You'll find plenty of evidence just in his work to back evoulution. (he is biased admittedly, but then so are your sources of information so that shouldn't be a problem should it?)LOL!!! I knew it!!! You would have NO/ZERO proofs of the darwin/evolutionism MYTH. Typical...
Actually I used to believe the Bible account 100%, it was through challenging and questioning that I have come to believe what I believe now- I'm not afraid of new ideas, challenges to my belief or faith and I'm open to new information- you haven't provided any of the above. Other people on this site have-even ones who've critisised me on this thread, and I enjoy disscussions with them. I haven't noticed you getting involved in any other threads yet-why not?you actually described yourself. Read your post again...and you will see.
lol, when the fence is shaken, the poll sitter might have a rude awakening (and a painful introduction), to deciding, which way...I would have put "sitting on fence" aka: "maybe yes, maybe no" as my poll answer.
lol, when the fence is shaken, the poll sitter might have a rude awakening (and a painful introduction), to deciding, which way...
he he he........need more information ...plead ignorance ...........I need to compare what you guys have written and rambled about here with googling and other info. Then I'll get off my fence.