Super intelligent beings.

fundamentalist
Could it be not regarded as simply envy, if without real fountation, good householder?

Not all science is as craven as you assume it to be.
Again, yours invited the refute it.

Simply saying "he must be bad" because lacking of any reasoning is pretty modern to substain firm holding on ignorance, but would such be regarded as intelligent, a real scientific approach?
 
Last edited:
Where does your food come from?

Don't bite the hand that feeds.
There are some who desire to give, good householder, some who know or trust that there is a way upwardly and beyond, but that's possible total the other way around than perceive-able, this something like food for ending food.

One wouldn't go on at ease if the supply would be based on science. So nothing to worry that a Monk would except what's dedicated for the sake of worldly pleasures. He would not even wast time on a place called to talk about things beyond sensual world, but actually turns out as just cultur-marxism development.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top