I am returning to a more Christian spirituality, personally, after a 10 year hiatus. One of the things that turned me off (and now affects me upon my re-introduction) is dogmatism.
As I understand it, the Bible is fairly clear on the idea that we are not perfect. And if we are not perfect, we cannot understand things perfectly. And if we do not understand things perfectly, then it would seem that arguing (discouraged in the Bible) grey areas as though we had a certain answer is misguided, at best.
I do not mean to be accusatory, but systems with an evangelical priority seem to produce the greatest transgressors in this regard. So my question is: does addressing complex questions from neophytes encourage forced answers, or does evangelism depend on a theological system that purports to actually have all the answers?
As I understand it, the Bible is fairly clear on the idea that we are not perfect. And if we are not perfect, we cannot understand things perfectly. And if we do not understand things perfectly, then it would seem that arguing (discouraged in the Bible) grey areas as though we had a certain answer is misguided, at best.
I do not mean to be accusatory, but systems with an evangelical priority seem to produce the greatest transgressors in this regard. So my question is: does addressing complex questions from neophytes encourage forced answers, or does evangelism depend on a theological system that purports to actually have all the answers?