seattlegal said:The question is, is race an active or a passive aspect with regard to one's religious practice? IMHO, cultural environment plays the active part, whereas any genetic tendancies are a naturally passive factor, unless the counscious choice is made to activate the race factor, and make a big deal out of it. JMHO.
Just as I said in my post:YO-ELEVEN-11 said:The fact that "race" is used so much to determine other things (like in a criminal investigations), IMHO I feel that it may not be a passive factor in this process. Although it can be put on the back burner when "culture" is introduced to the process. The fact that most (NOT ALL) people tend to naturally mirgrate toward their race when doing or practicing intimate things like their beliefs. It is not a big deal, but it can be a useful tool in looking into ones choice patterns in life. Your observation is sound and very logical, but how can race be a passive in this situation?
We are the ones who choose to make a big deal out of race. If you put two toddlers of different races together to play, the race factor is not an issue. It only becomes an issue if we make it into an issue. Toddlers don't seem to make an issue out of it.seattlegal said:unless the counscious choice is made to activate the race factor, and make a big deal out of it. JMHO.
flowperson said:This blurring of the boundaries of race and culture is, I believe, pretty specific to economic class. That is, at present rice farmers in Laos can't, for the most part, surf the net after a hard day in the paddy and jet off on three day weekends to attend revelries in Bangkok. Most people in the third world and in the lower economic classes in developed countries simply do not have the resources to participate in the dreams that America and Western Europe have been exporting for the past fifty years or so.
In fact there is abundant evidence that the gap between people with the economic advantages to do such things and the poor is widening apace. This is a very troubling thing for dream exporters to deal with, and I believe that's why we're seeing the redoubling of efforts at economic development in areas such as Africa, especially in the sub-Saharan region.
So, aside from the obvious limitations of genetic, environmental, and familial programming, there is simply not enough wealth available to anticipate that the dream of a coffee-colored-skinned world speaking regional forms of English to each other might come true in the near future. But I believe that It could happen in a few hundred years or so if certain governments don't inadvertantly foul our world beyond its ability to heal and sustain itself.
flow....
wil said:Anecdotal thought to add to the mix....what color/culture is your church?
Mine is just about 50/50 white/black ratio, we do have maybe 2-5% hispanic...and maybe about 10% of the ethnic blacks are from the islands.
They've arrived from a variety of previous denominations, classes, less than 1% were raised in Unity...the majority came from a more fundamental backround...the minority from a non-religious youth or recent years and are returning to be more spiritual..
wil said:Anecdotal thought to add to the mix....what color/culture is your church?
Mine is just about 50/50 white/black ratio, we do have maybe 2-5% hispanic...and maybe about 10% of the ethnic blacks are from the islands.
They've arrived from a variety of previous denominations, classes, less than 1% were raised in Unity...the majority came from a more fundamental backround...the minority from a non-religious youth or recent years and are returning to be more spiritual..
Since all Revealed Religions are guidance for man, the created one, from One God the Creator; and in origin are true, race and culture have no bearing on it. Race, country and culture are for man for easy recognition.YO-ELEVEN-11 said:What I would like to know is if race and culture play a part in most peoples decision on their choice of religious faith?
Virtual_Cliff said:There seems to be an implication in this question that the choice of religion is purely an individual option. As such it is framed in the context of the prevailing materialistic / individualistic culture of modern Westernised nations.
This approach can give rise to a purely superficial and ineffectual take on religion. The full power of a religion can only be experienced when it is manifested through the spirit of a community or nation. For example, it is almost impossible to separate the Jewish faith from its people and its culture. We Christians have much to learn from Jews and Muslims in terms of the internalisation of the faith into every aspect of our individual and communal life.
Virtual_Cliff said:There seems to be an implication in this question that the choice of religion is purely an individual option. As such it is framed in the context of the prevailing materialistic / individualistic culture of modern Westernised nations.
This approach can give rise to a purely superficial and ineffectual take on religion. The full power of a religion can only be experienced when it is manifested through the spirit of a community or nation. For example, it is almost impossible to separate the Jewish faith from its people and its culture. We Christians have much to learn from Jews and Muslims in terms of the internalisation of the faith into every aspect of our individual and communal life.
queenofsheba said:In my opinion, there was a strong relation between ethnicity, language and religion in the past, but today that relation is much vaguer. Religious borders are often different from ethnical are linguistic borders, because of all kind of historical events.