Gnostradamus
Member
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
A common criticism of Muslims against the Bible is that there appear to be contradictions, and at the same time the Qur'an is supposedly free of contradictions.
Though my intention here is not to inflame anyone, there can be no doubt that there will be some heated responses to this thread.
The purpose of this thread is to measure the opinions of people from as many faiths as possible, not just Abrahamic faiths.
...........................................................................................................
Here is part of Salih's story in the Qur'an;
Surah 7:73
Quote:To the Thamud people (We sent) Salih, one of their own brethren: He said: "O my people! worship Allah: ye have no other god but Him. Now hath come unto you a clear (Sign) from your Lord! This she-camel of Allah is a Sign unto you: So leave her to graze in Allah's earth, and let her come to no harm, or ye shall be seized with a grievous punishment.
Now compare this to the following;
Surah 5:103
Quote:It was not Allah who instituted (superstitions like those of) a slit-ear she-camel, or a she-camel let loose for free pasture, or idol sacrifices for twin-births in animals, or stallion-camels freed from work: It is blasphemers who invent a lie against Allah; but most of them lack wisdom.
The arabic word used in this verse is Sa'ibah which is interpreted as follows;
Ibn Ishaq the Muslim Historian was quoted in the biography of Muhammad (Ar-Raheequl-Makhtum by Safiyr-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri);
Quote:Sa'ibah; a female camel that gave birth to ten successive females, but no males. It was then set free and all were forbidden to tie her, shear off her wool, or milk her.
Ibn Hisham 1/90-90;
Quote:A she-camel consecutively giving birth to ten female calves without the intervention of any male calf was tabooed and was named al-sa'ibah. She was not to be used for riding or carrying any load, her hair was not to be trimmed and her milk was not to be drunk except by a guest.
I have drawn three parallels;
1) Both she-camels
2) Both set loose for free pasture
3) Both were miraculous signs and therefore tabboo.
So from a completely unbiased point of view, what would you make of this?
.
Though my intention here is not to inflame anyone, there can be no doubt that there will be some heated responses to this thread.
The purpose of this thread is to measure the opinions of people from as many faiths as possible, not just Abrahamic faiths.
...........................................................................................................
Here is part of Salih's story in the Qur'an;
Surah 7:73
Quote:To the Thamud people (We sent) Salih, one of their own brethren: He said: "O my people! worship Allah: ye have no other god but Him. Now hath come unto you a clear (Sign) from your Lord! This she-camel of Allah is a Sign unto you: So leave her to graze in Allah's earth, and let her come to no harm, or ye shall be seized with a grievous punishment.
Now compare this to the following;
Surah 5:103
Quote:It was not Allah who instituted (superstitions like those of) a slit-ear she-camel, or a she-camel let loose for free pasture, or idol sacrifices for twin-births in animals, or stallion-camels freed from work: It is blasphemers who invent a lie against Allah; but most of them lack wisdom.
The arabic word used in this verse is Sa'ibah which is interpreted as follows;
Ibn Ishaq the Muslim Historian was quoted in the biography of Muhammad (Ar-Raheequl-Makhtum by Safiyr-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri);
Quote:Sa'ibah; a female camel that gave birth to ten successive females, but no males. It was then set free and all were forbidden to tie her, shear off her wool, or milk her.
Ibn Hisham 1/90-90;
Quote:A she-camel consecutively giving birth to ten female calves without the intervention of any male calf was tabooed and was named al-sa'ibah. She was not to be used for riding or carrying any load, her hair was not to be trimmed and her milk was not to be drunk except by a guest.
I have drawn three parallels;
1) Both she-camels
2) Both set loose for free pasture
3) Both were miraculous signs and therefore tabboo.
So from a completely unbiased point of view, what would you make of this?
.