Catholic Pope Francis made a startling revelation Thursday by stating that hell did not exist, in an interview with a leading liberal Italian newspaper.
I wish!
But did he? Really? The reporting seems in doubt ...
So what did he say? Well Scalfari seems to be back-tracking, the Vatican press office is denying it, Catholic doctrine makes such a statement unlikely, and Pope Francis himself has declared in no uncertain terms a belief in the devil, in angels and demons.
If he is seeking to change Catholic doctrine, then informal conversations with atheists is not the way to do it.
Then again, our contemporary vision of hell is an image formed in the Middle Ages, and has precious little to do with its foundational scriptural references, and more to do with the imagination of Dante Alighieri's
Inferno and the paintings of Hieronymus Bosch.
I'm with Aussie on this one.
The eschaton sits between two poles. One the one hand we have the apokatastasis, the idea of universal reconciliation (all souls are saved), and on the other anihilationism, that unredeemed souls simply cease to exist. That goes right the way back to Irenaeus, who first formulated the doctrine of salvation. St Augustine seems to allow the same view, although this is rarely presented.
Some more recent major Catholic thinkers have questioned the idea of hell as popularly understood. Hans Urs von Balthasar posed the question in his book
Dare We Hope That All Men Be Saved?, while controversial Catholic theologian Hans Kung’s 1984
Eternal Life suggested hell should be understood only as the absence of God, not physical torment.