Principles of non-partisanship...
Postmaster said:
If Baha'is stay withdrawn from politics what happens if a political system or government becomes corrupted?
That's a very good question Postmaster! and thanks for asking...
A couple of things that I think are important here to suggest and that is Baha'is have now had experience in several different political and social systems around the world in the past hundred years or so ...so even though we are a relatively new revelation there some historical examples to draw from.
Baha'is have been a fairly large minority in Iran-Persia for some time now being currently outlawed but under past regimes somewhat tolerated with varying amounts of persecution and oppression.. The Baha'is during the past century have been non-partisan over all. Refusing to side with Constitutional or Monarchical or Radical elements in the Iranian political theatre...this lead to tensions where the Baha'is were sought after to support say the different parties.
Generally Baha'is were perceived as modernists and Bhaa'is were also generally well trained, educated people as a group. But anyway by remaining neutral and being very principled about this neutrality albeit under pressure the Baha'is I think as a minority were able too avoid some of the political roller coasters and while at times were accused of various things most people I think were appreciative. While non-partisan Baha'is were loyal to the duly constituted authorities thus earnig a degree of respect over time. In the current regime the Faith is outlawed and suppressed.
But I would say as a principled movement the Baha'is in Iran being a fairly large minority are admired albeit secretely and informally by many people so the effect has been gradual over an extended time say over the past century or so. There were examples in the past regime where Baha'is were entrusted with some important posts that indicated they were valued.
So by their example, integrity and reputation for being principled the Faith in Iran has survived albeit currently under a great deal of pressure and provided a good example under these dire circumstances.
During the Nazi regime in Germany the Baha'is were relatively few in number and also maintained a strict neautrality and were also not involved in any plots or resistance activities as such but nonetheless were imprisoned and their literature seized and so on... but after WWII the German Baha'i community revived and is the home for the main House of Worship on the Eurpoean continent.
Early in the twentieth century, Baha'is from Iran settled in Ashqabad and built the first Baha'i House of Worship there and it was tolerated by the Tsarist regime. Under the early Communist regime a measure of toleration continued however Communist youth Komsommal organization resented the fact that many youth in the area were attracted to the Faith and eventually the Baha'is were oppressed along with other religious groups. The House of Worship was seized and at first leased back to the Baha'is and later used as a Museum. The Baha'is were shipped around by Stalin to Siberia or returned to Iran but some Baha'is survived and today the Faith is recognized and permitted to function in the Russian Federation.
So in dictaorships the Faith is usually suppressed but our influence in spite of that has been I would say very principled and exemplary. So the Faith provides an example through it's principles over the long haul that do I believe influence society.
People have to understand though that our goals are very long range and so we are not focused say on the next election or involved in politics whatsoever, but we do have a template in mind for the future in which there can be a democratic (maybe a constitutional monarchical society with parliament type government) society involving all classes with a reduction of the extremes of poverty and wealth and a stable society under law.
- Art