pattimax
Somewhat returning
says you. that sounds like a smug little bit of trite rhetoric to me.
b'shalom
bananabrain
Smug and maybe trite, but true.
says you. that sounds like a smug little bit of trite rhetoric to me.
b'shalom
bananabrain
And tell me, how would you do that? The NT is required.no they bloody aren't. if they were, we'd have bloody noticed. orright?
b'shalom
bananabrain
yes, the jewish bit. why are we supposed to relate to the christian bit if it's nothing to do with us? why are we obliged to justify our lack of relationship to it? do i also have to justify my lack of relationship to confucius' analects?
b'shalom
bananabrain
but we don't talk about eternal life, only the portion in the world-to-come; and even so, we're far more concerned about this world. we're not that worried about "perishing" - we trust that G!D knows what G!D's up to.
b'shalom
bananabrain
big fecking deal if there won't be any judaism left after they've done with us.
Hah, never thought it that way!
why can't you just help people without converting them as well? it makes me sick how these kinds of conditions are attached to supposed acts of goodwill and mercy.
Is there any difference if they become hardcore atheists?
BB, I am not advocating christianity over judaism, just trying to see things from their perspective (I used to be one of them), and look beyond labels but what benefits people.
I suppose, what I am suggesting is that human/divine compassion may take different guises.
we never needed christianity. we didn't need it in egypt, under the greeks, or under the romans. we didn't need it in the east or the west. we didn't need it, full stop. what we needed was to understand what we ALREADY HAD.
I think your statement is valid for yourself, the same thing can be said of people from any other religion. For example, a christian that converts to Islam: he couldn't see what he already had in the christian framework.
Can't say for others, different people need different things, I believe that those that don't switch will twist what they have until it fits.
People will break their mold if that suits them. I am not talking of converting people, rather that is positive if people find something different that improves their existence.
Excuse my manners, I was being nice. The fact is that God stopped talking for a while and the Jews thought he was done.
Confucius' analects have nothing to do with Christianity.
Yes, but christianity came out of judaism, not the other way around.
Do mainstream christianity seek relationship to JWs and mormons?
People will break their mold if that suits them. I am not talking of converting people, rather that is positive if people find something different that improves their existence.
and that is of course your prerogative, as of course it is your prerogative to ignore what the Text actually says in the original language or how it is interpreted by the people who are most familiar with both the language and the content.BlaznFattyz said:where you find theological wishful thinking, i find the revealing of G!D by the holy spirit thru his word and thru the spirit, and all proclaim jesus is lord.
well, the NT may be prophecy revealed, but not of the OT at any rate. it certainly doesn't fulfil it - at least not without doing violence to the plain meaning and grammar of the prophecies it claims to be meeting. unless you've found a way to make the hebrew word "alma" in isaiah 7:14 mean "virgin", when the correct word for this is "betulah", which isaiah could have used if he wanted to and does in five other places: 23:4; 23:12; 37:22; 47:1 and 62:5. similarly, you have to avoid the fact that the "suffering servant" was actually identified as "jacob" (i.e., the jewish people) 41:8-9, 44:1, 44:21, 49:3 and 45:4. and the latter isn't even a translation problem!pattimax said:Smug and maybe trite, but true.
not by us it isn't. we have an entire corpus of laws on how to recognise a kosher prophet, let alone the Messiah.And tell me, how would you do that? The NT is required.
not really.Caimanson said:Is there any difference if they become hardcore atheists?
oh, absolutely. but stuff for us comes through the jewish channels.human/divine compassion may take different guises.
ok, but presumably you'd say the same thing about an atheist or an animist new guinean tribesman too. what caimanson was asking was whether you are prepared to concede that their scriptures and traditions fulfil the prophetic expectations of the NT - or the baha'is, for that matter. attempts to show continuity of tradition must be based in fact, not wishful thinking or convenient mistranslations.pattimax said:"Seek a relationship" with JWs and Mormons? Yes, genuine Christianity has the responsibility to show that Jesus Christ is the only way to eternal life.
That fits in just fine. Is Jesus Christ not Lord?