Postmaster
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,312
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 0
I'm going to be quite bold on this one, as I usually am. I've been thinking of the posibility that Manichaeism influenced freemanson principles.
This is how I come to the conclusion, the original freemasons were an organisation or society of people who originally built religious buildings, this came with benifits in Europe as these kind of people were in demand, so they developed some kind of advanced fellowship society.
My question is, who built the Manichaeism temples in Europe up to AD1000?
Could it only have been the masons? Of course, who else?
side note. Wikipedia claims the heretical Cathars (mentioned in Dan Browns Di vinci codes) had Manichaeism traditions and ideology.
This is how I come to the conclusion, the original freemasons were an organisation or society of people who originally built religious buildings, this came with benifits in Europe as these kind of people were in demand, so they developed some kind of advanced fellowship society.
The faith maintained a sporadic and intermittent existence in the west (Mesopotamia, Africa, Spain, France, North Italy, the Balkans) for a thousand years, and flourished for a time in the land of its birth (Persia) and even further east in Northern India, Western China, and Tibet.
My question is, who built the Manichaeism temples in Europe up to AD1000?
Could it only have been the masons? Of course, who else?
side note. Wikipedia claims the heretical Cathars (mentioned in Dan Browns Di vinci codes) had Manichaeism traditions and ideology.