JosephM
Well-Known Member
(snip)
Do you see the difference in men like Isaiah and David, to maybe me and you and most of the world?
(snip)
Paul, I am not Leo but I do not see the difference in men like Isaiah and David to maybe me and you. I do not see God as being a respecter of persons.
James 5:17
Elias was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months.
Paul said:Yes but your attbributing a continunous state of sin to a Holy person.
Like being a drunk, drug addict or homosexual.
You put them down in the mire, not up in the heavens.
I think you read too much into what Leo has said. He said David was "human just like the rest of us". I find no evidence to support otherwise. That David was guilty of premeditated murder and stealing another man's wife is a matter of biblical record. He repented and was forgiven same as anyone else who committs such acts and repents. Nobody said anything about David being in a continuous state of sin.
Paul said:If these men in scripture were drunks, drug addicts, criminals, and whatever else, they would not be witnesses of God.
They were great witnesses of God, His love shone through them.
Most of us are at a lower stage in our spiritual growth and we are not the witnesses they were can you agree?
On the contrary, God sometimes chooses the worst of sinners to be the best of his witnesses. Take Saul/Paul for example who admittedly had many Christians killed in the name of God but was later one of his greatest witnesses.
Paul said:Or do you say you have reached the height David did.
That any homosexual has?
Drug addict, drunk?
Why get personal? God knows the hearts of men. In Leo's defense, he said no such thing.
Paul said:Your not questioning the fact that David and Johnathan kissed each other, for there is no question they did.
But you are insulting the innocence and purity of their love.
What if someone was questioning your sexuality, or one of your loved ones who had died, or even accusing them of other sins they didn't have.
What if the accusation was of peodophilier.
We know Davids sin and his greatness, you are questioning him to add sin to his name which there are no grounds whatsover
That it undoubtedly is.
But it doesn't stop you insulting his greatest witnesses, those closest to him as having reached Him with such a mind of impiurity.
You insult His name, it doesn't change His name, but it's still an insult.
Perhaps a moment of prayer and chilling out would be in order.
Love and Peace.
JM