Global Warming Watch

got an email from greenpeace asking to sign a petition against obama's bill which greenpeace says does not go far enough.


''President Obama vowed to “restore science to its rightful place” in his inaugural address, yet ACES all but ignores the science. Take action now and urge Obama to be a leader on global warming.

Here’s what’s WRONG with the legislation:
  • The Nobel-prize winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says that to avoid the worst climate impacts such as intense droughts, super charged hurricanes and increased heat waves, the U.S. and other industrialized countries must cut their emissions by 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020. This bill, as it’s currently written, only calls for a 4% reduction by 2020. And there’s very little chance those targets will be improved.
  • These weak targets are made even worse by 2 billion tons per year of allowable offsets. Offsets allow polluters to put off for more than a decade real cuts in their emissions The offsets are so high that they will exceed the actual pollution reductions required until at least 2026 — that’s time we don’t have!
  • Coal-fired power plants are the single largest source of global warming pollution in the U.S. In order to tackle climate change, we need to begin phasing out coal immediately. But instead of phasing-out coal plants, ACES will actually encourage the growth of a new generation of coal-fired plants! To add insult to injury, tens of billions of taxpayer dollars would be spent on the myth of carbon capture and sequestration — an untested and unproven technology that is decades away from full-scale deployment even by the most optimistic estimates.
Worst of all, ACES will actually remove the President’s existing authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act—an authority that was recently reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. Now that the House has proven that it won’t step up and stop global warming, President Obama’s power to regulate greenhouse gases is our greatest hope.

Urge your member of Congress to vote against this bill, and tell the President he MUST deliver on his campaign pledge to set climate policy based on science, not politics. Take action now!''
 
Ok...you guys tell me...EU complains about US emissions and us being the problem...well how come you guys can buy the cars that don't meet our emission standards???


35 MPG can be an immediate reality, with one domestic manufacturer, if the United States government would only allow it to happen. Our elected representatives need to be aware of the facts and make the appropriate decisions.
35_grand_cherokee_s.jpg
Chrysler is uniquely positioned among the Big Three US automakers. Unlike Ford and General Motors, Chrysler is already building a slew of high-MPG diesel-powered vehicles right here in the United States.
Amazing as it may seem in these difficult times, Chrysler is not allowed to sell those cars domestically, due to recently tightened emissions regulations. With the exception of the domestically-available Jeep Grand Cherokee diesel, all of Chrysler’s North American manufactured high-MPG diesel-equipped vehicles are being shipped abroad.
Each and every one of Chrysler’s European models is available with a diesel engine, with the exception of the Dodge Viper. In fact, a diesel engine can be found under the hood of more than 50% of the vehicles that Chrysler sells in Europe.
All-in-all, a dozen Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep diesel-engined models are currently available outside of the United States, but are not sold domestically.
Here’s the eye-opener … half of those models currently achieve 35 miles per gallon combined.
That’s 35 MPG … right now.
And what’s even more crazy? All of these 35 MPG cars and SUVs are built in North American plants by North American workers … American citizens cannot buy and drive the fuel-efficient cars they build.
35_300_sedan.jpg
The thriftiest of the bunch delivers nearly 50 MPG on the highway … and it’s no dog off the line, turning in 0-62 mile per hour (MPH) times under nine seconds. The fastest in the pack delivers 7.6 second 0-62 times and 35.6 MPG on the highway.
Needless to say, these are wonderful world-class cars, a world apart from your Uncle’s noisy, slow, smelly 80’s-era diesel.

The Mercedes-Benz V6 diesel-equipped Jeep Grand Cherokee is the first US-built passenger vehicle to meet the tougher Federal emissions requirements. With the emissions work done on the Mercedes’ 3.0 liter engine, we expect the Chrysler 300 to be the next diesel-powered domestic, as it shares the same powerplant. (At present, diesel 300s are being built in Graz, Austria.)
Chrysler is using four different diesel engines, in all:
  • 2.0 liter Volkswagen turbo-diesel inline four (Avenger, Caliber, Compass, Journey, Sebring, Patriot)
  • 2.2 liter Mercedes-Benz inline four (PT Cruiser)
  • 2.8 liter VM Motari inline four (Cherokee, Grand Voyager, Nitro, Wrangler)
  • 3.0 liter Mercedes-Benz V6 (300, Commander, Grand Cherokee)
What if the federal government temporarily rolled back the emissions requirements for one or two years, to allow the sale of these fuel-sipping vehicles while Chrysler and its partners complete the engineering necessary to meet the current regulations?
Crazier schemes have been implemented to stimulate the economy, no doubt about that. But this one just might work … by spurring investment and putting people back to work.
As you ponder that thought, take a gander at a group of specifications that compare the European diesels with the most fuel-efficient engines in each of the US domestics …
Jeep Patriot Diesel

35_patriot.jpg
Plant:
Belvedere, IL
Engine: Volkswagen 2.0 liter common rail turbo-diesel inline four cylinder engine, producing 138 HP and 229 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 11 seconds when equipped with a six-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 2.4 liter I4/5-speed/2WD - more: Jeep Patriot Gas Mileage Ratings)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
42.8
28​
City​
26.7
23​
Combined​
35.1

Jeep Compass Diesel

35_compass.jpg
Plant:
Belvedere, IL
Engine: Volkswagen 2.0 liter common rail turbo-diesel inline four cylinder engine, producing 138 HP and 229 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 11 seconds when equipped with a six-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 2.4 liter I4/5-speed/2WD - more: Jeep Compass Gas Mileage Ratings)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
43.5
28​
City​
28.3
23​
Combined​
36.2

Jeep Wrangler Diesel

35_wrangler.jpg
Plant:
Toledo, Ohio
Engine: VM Motori 2.8 liter common rail diesel four cylinder, producing 174 HP and 302 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 11.2 seconds (two door), 11.7 seconds (four door) when equipped with a six-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 3.8 liter V6/6-speed/2WD)
Two-door​
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
28.3
21​
City​
18.5
16​
Combined​
23.7

Jeep Cherokee (aka: Liberty) Diesel

35_cherokee.jpg
Plant:
Toledo, Ohio
Engine: VM Motori 2.8 liter common rail diesel four cylinder, producing 161 HP and 295 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 11.2 seconds when equipped with a six-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 3.7 liter V6/6-speed/2WD)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
30.6
22​
City​
19.6
16​
Combined​
25.3

(The 2.8 liter diesel engine was available in the domestic Jeep Liberty in the 2005 and 2006 model years.)
Jeep Commander Diesel

35_J08_commander.jpg
Plant:
Jefferson North, MI
Engine: Mercedes-Benz 3.0 liter common rail diesel, producing 215 HP and 376 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 9.0 seconds when equipped with a five-speed automatic transmission.
(Domestic: 3.7 liter/V6/5-speed Auto/2WD or 4.7 liter/V8/5-speed Auto/2WD)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
25.6
19​
City​
17.4
14​
Combined​
21.8

Chrysler 300 Diesel

35_300_wagon.jpg
Plant:
Brampton, Ontario & Graz, Austria (diesels)
Engine: Mercedes-Benz 3.0 liter common rail diesel, producing 215 HP and 376 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 7.6 seconds - Sedan (Saloon), 8.6 seconds - Wagon (Touring), when equipped with a five-speed automatic transmission.
(Domestic: 2.7 liter V6/5-speed Auto)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
35.6
26​
City​
21.8
18​
Combined​
29

Chrysler Grand Voyager (aka: Town & Country) Diesel

35_grand_voyager.jpg
Plant:
St. Louis (diesels)
Engine: VM Motori 2.8 liter common rail diesel four cylinder, producing 174 161 HP and 339 265 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 12 seconds when equipped with a four-speed automatic transmission.
(Domestic: 3.3 liter V6/4-speed auto - more: Chrysler Town and Country Gas Mileage Ratings)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
35.1
24​
City​
20.5
17​
Combined​
27.6

Chrysler PT Cruiser Diesel

35_pt_cruiser.jpg
Plant:
Toluca, Mexico
Engine: Mercedes-Benz 2.2 liter common rail diesel four cylinder, producing 148 HP and 221 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 10.8 second, when equipped with a five-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 2.4 liter I4/5-speed Manual - more: Chrysler PT Cruiser Gas Mileage Ratings)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway
42
26​
City
27.3
21​
Combined
35.1

Chrysler Sebring Diesel

35_sebring.jpg
Plant:
Sterling Heights, MI
Engine: Volkswagen 2.0 liter common rail turbo-diesel four cylinder, producing 138 HP and 229 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 12 seconds when equipped with a six-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 2.4 liter I4/4-speed auto - more: Chrysler Sebring Gas Mileage Ratings)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
46.1
30​
City​
28.6
21​
Combined​
38

Dodge Avenger Diesel

35_avenger.jpg
Plant:
Sterling Heights, MI
Engine: Volkswagen 2.0 liter common rail turbo-diesel four cylinder, producing 138 HP and 229 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 12 seconds when equipped with a six-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 2.4 liter I4/4-speed auto - more: Dodge Avenger Gas Mileage Ratings)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
46.1
30​
City​
28.6
21​
Combined​
38

Dodge Caliber Diesel

35_caliber.jpg
Plant:
Belvidere, IL
Engine: Volkswagen 2.0 liter common rail turbo-diesel, producing 138 HP and 229 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 8.8 seconds when equipped with a six-speed manual transmission.
(Domestic: 1.8 liter I4/5-speed manual)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
49
29​
City​
29.8
24​
Combined​
39.2

Dodge Nitro Diesel

35_nitro.jpg
Plant:
Toledo, Ohio
Engine: VM Motori 2.8 liter common rail diesel four cylinder, producing 174 HP and 339 302 foot pounds of torque. 0-62 MPH in 10.5 second when equipped with a five-speed automatic transmission.
(Domestic: 3.7 liter V6/6-speed manual)
US MPG Euro Diesel
Domestic US MPG​
Highway​
30.1
22​
City​
19.3
16​
Combined​
25

Dodge Journey Diesel (Coming Soon)

35_journey.jpg
Plant:
Toluca, Mexico
Engine: Volkswagen 2.0 liter common rail turbo-diesel four cylinder, producing 140 HP and 229 foot pounds of torque. Equipped with a six-speed manual or automatic transmission.
Mileage figures yet to be released.

Footnotes:
(1) MPG figures were converted from UK urban/extra-urban/combined mile per British gallon estimates for the purposes of this report, using publicly available data.
(2) Chrysler assembles, but does not manufacture, diesel-powered Dodge Sprinter Vans in Charleston, South Carolina. Mercedes-Benz ships the parts from Europe.
(3) Cummins diesel engines are a popular domestic option in heavy-duty models of the Dodge Ram pickup. Dodge is poised to extend diesel engines throughout the range.
 
will, are you saying these vehicles are only unavailable to Americans after the recent revision to emissions laws a few weeks ago?

Or have they been unavailable for much longer?
 
They've never been available to US owners...the emisssion control requirements in the states create issues with the higher mpg diesels.

Seems like emissions per mile would be more important, than at idle...but I'm no expert.

But the question I have is, how can the EU citz and gov't look down their collective noses when they are allowing these cars to be sold...and buying them?
 
Came across this article today regarding methane extraction. If you stick with it to the third page you see that the extraction process may be able to be utilised as a carbon sink. While it is still a carbon producing gas the need for gasses as fuels will always be there and this, in conjunction with co2 scrubers at the burn point, seems like it has potential.

Ice on fire: The next fossil fuel - environment - 24 June 2009 - New Scientist

Interesting to see movement already on this, with Putin leading a mini-sub to the bottom of Lake Baikal to observe the crystals:
BBC NEWS | Europe | Putin dives world's deepest lake
 
A short radio piece on Greenland and how global warming might change it...as a place to exploit. :mad:

Yeah... we'll be invading Greenland too.


Climate Change Seen as Threat to U.S. Security — N.Y. Times

"Recent war games and intelligence studies conclude that over the next 20 to 30 years, vulnerable regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and South and Southeast Asia, will face the prospect of food shortages, water crises and catastrophic flooding driven by climate change that could demand an American humanitarian relief or military response."​


Because once you've spent all that money on guns... it would be a shame not to use 'em.
 
Ironic isn't it. 90% of "greenhouse" effect, is not CO2, or any other gas, but rather H2O (water), in the form of vapors, droplets and clouds...

Doubly ironic that man produces only 2.8 % per year of the total CO2 production on this planet...

Trippley ironic that we still don't have a mean temperature for the entire planet, from which to base our determination for "global" warming...

Best guess is 14*C, but even that is speculative in the science comunity.
 
Carbon dioxide controls Earth's temperature

"Various atmospheric components differ in their contributions to the greenhouse effect, some through feedbacks and some through forcings. Without carbon dioxide and other non-condensing greenhouse gases, water vapor and clouds would be unable to provide the feedback mechanisms that amplify the greenhouse effect."
 
Ironic isn't it. 90% of "greenhouse" effect, is not CO2, or any other gas, but rather H2O (water)...

Humans are at least 60% water.

It's amazing what water can do when you add a few other ingredients to it.
 
Study could mean greater anticipated global warming

"Global climate models disagree widely in the magnitude of the warming we can expect with increasing carbon dioxide. This is mainly because the models represent clouds differently. A new modeling approach successfully simulates the observed cloud fields in a key region for climate. The study finds a greater tendency for clouds to thin with global warming than in any of the current climate models. This means the expected warming may be greater than currently anticipated."
 
Back
Top