Please do post your requests for avatars here. There are already a number already up - but I'll be happy to try and track down particular themes. Just let me know.
Thank you Brian.Please do post your requests for avatars here. There are already a number already up - but I'll be happy to try and track down particular themes. Just let me know.
I said:Hi juantoo3 - and welcome to CR.
Do you see any particular image on the internet that conveys what you're after? If so, if you could send me a link I'll be happy to reformat it and add it to your profile.
I too, am ignorant of "computerese", it's all geek to me. But I do use "context" to assist me in figuring out what somebody means by a term. "Avatar" also seems to have a connotation in wicca, but since that was not the context in which it was being used, that is not the context in which I accepted it. (I have more to say to the issue of context, but I will post it on another thread, since this one seems to me dedicated to issues concerning the formatting of responder's unique identities.)I am an ignoramus when it comes to computerese or Internet forumese. I don’t know about ‘avatars’; so I look it up and learn that in Hinduism/Buddhism an avatar is an incarnation of a Hindu deity. And in Internet forums it is fashionable now to adopt an avatar for one’s pictorial icon, something like that.
Which explains, at least in part, what you say here. As concepts from one venue of thought/philosophy/religion transfer to another, it seems natural to use terms that relate, even if the concept does not wholly transfer.The practice of mankind seems to turn out again and again similar from one age to another, from one domain of endeavors to another.
It seems to me a curious observation from a Catholic, the use of pictorial icons. The difference being that these "avatars" are not symbols directly worshipped here, merely representative identification. My desire to use a Native American symbol stems from my heritage, and my purpose is much like that of a "nickname". Since Coyote has been my nickname for years, I live daily giving credence to my nickname. Coyote is me, therefore all I do gives credit to Coyote. I can just as easily post here without an avatar, it really makes no difference to me. Even without a pictorial icon, all I do gives credence to Coyote. Note here, credence is not worship. I do not worship Coyote, I relate to Coyote.Moral of the story: Guys adopting avatars, better lead lives doing credit to your avatars.
Is this humorous, or ironic? Or perhaps, humorously ironic? And then there is the issue of being culturally acceptable not only to relate to, but also to actually name a person after, a religious figure, yet take issue with a pictorial representation as an anonymous representation of a forum participant? Am I missing something?In the Catholic Church we have patron saints after whom Catholics are fond of naming their children. In some Catholic countries they even use the names of Jesus and the persons of the Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit for their own proper names.
Thus there was a notorious criminal long in the most wanted list in a certain very Catholic country, named Jesus del Espiritu Santo. He got shot dead one day fleeing and shooting it out with pursuing police. The headline in the papers the following day: "Jesus shot dead resisting arrest".