Vaj
Vajradhara said:
i cannot say what these 9 men do on a day to day basis... if you could fill us in that would greatly facilitate the conversation i suspect...
I don't entirely know... tho I suppose they start by getting up and brushing their teeth...
uh, ok. seriously: I can list some of the day-to-day things that they do:
-- direct a staff which includes secretariat, research team, others
-- deal with requests for specific guidance on issues from the xx National Spiritual Assemblies
-- respond to all recommendations suggested by the Baha'is at their Conventions
-- consult with counsellors, board members, etc about the needs/concerns of communities
-- develop plans for growth and consolidation
-- oversee the preparation of materials for use by communities to assist in improving their ability to serve the needs of the believers
-- they (more likely staff, in minor matters) respond to personal inquiries and questions from individual believers
-- oversee the preservation of original texts and their translation into other languages
Here is a link to the Constitution of the Universal House of Justice so that you can peruse it in detail, if you wish:
http://www.bahai.org/article-1-3-6-1.html
Vajradhara said:
however, it seems that since there is no "electioneering" i.e. trying to get votes, representing your position and so forth, how does one know whom to vote for and what they represent?
Each of us votes for people whom we know, in our own local communities, we get to know each other pretty well. In very large communities (1000-2000 members, we are unlikely to know one another so intimately, but, we naturally get to know best those people who are most active -- these people become broadly known directly because of their levels of commitment, dedication and capacity. Once we reach the Convention level, our chosen delegates are generally people who are active on a regional or national level and tend to travel broadly, as regional teaching commitee members, speakers, summer school teachers, writers, website hosts, etc., and these people really are quite well known to us and to each other.
When a vote is taken, at any level, we are instructed to search our hearts for the people known to us who have the capacities needed to fill the role of serving on the elected institutions.
I'm going to holler for a little help from Shoghi Effendi here:
"Hence it is incumbent upon the chosen delegates to consider without the least trace of passion and prejudice, and irrespective of any material consideration, the names of only those who can best combine the necessary qualities of unquestioned loyalty, of selfless devotion, of a well-trained mind, of recognized ability and mature experience."
Vajradhara said:
whilst i agree with the principle that 9 people do not a "body politic" make, if the group that is empowered to make binding decisions is not open to all members, it can be viewed in a very exclusive fasion.. perhaps this is what you (or another poster) were alluding to previously? in any event... this group, perhaps "executive body" would have been better? is the one from which women are excluded.
I guess this is an unanswerable. Maybe it's a Koan? I asked my ex-husband and friend (he is schizophrenic-Taoist-sort of Baha'i and an occassional source of a unique point of view!!!!) what I might answer to this, since we have already told you that we don't know why ... he said: "Because Baha'u'llah wanted it that way."
But perhaps a quote or two about the equality of men and women might assuage the "pricking of your thumbs" a bit:
"The emancipation of women, the achievement of full equality between the sexes is essential to human progress and the transformation of society. Inequality retards not only the advancement of women but the progress of civilization itself. The persistent denial of equality to one-half of the world's population is an affront to human dignity. It promotes destructive attitudes and habits in men and women that pass from the family to the work place, to political life, and ultimately to international relations. On no grounds, moral, biological, or traditional can inequality be justified. The moral and psychological climate necessary to enable our nation to establish social justice and to contribute to global peace will be created only when women attain full partnership with men in all fields of endeavor." First paragraph of Two Wings of a Bird; The Equality of Women and Men
by National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the United States
entire document at:
http://bahai-library.com/?file=nsa_two_wings_bird.html
no, make that just one quote. I've already given you a day's worth of reading. If you do a search at that link you will find dozens of similar documents. This one represents our attitude very well.
Vajradhara said:
i know that i seem to be going on and on about it.. but i really have no tolerance (pun intended) for people that discriminate based on gender, race, creed, sexual orientation or physical impediment. i'm not saying that the Bahai' faith does this, however, this is the impression that i currently have based on my admittedly scarce knowledge of your tradition, thus, my repetitive queries.
i do appreciate the patience that has been shown whilst engaging in my sometimes pointless conversation.[/QUOTE]
Well, this sort of answers your question about what is "deepening." People keep asking questions and we keep having to hit the books... thus we expand our knowledge and "deepen" our understanding. Wrestling with angels is good for us. ;-)
Vajradhara said:
oh.. i've got some big ones that, again based on my scant knowledge, would seem to be rather tricky for the Baha'i
I know. I don't mind. And wrestling with angels is probably good for you, too. ;-)
Vajradhara said:
i'm interested in exploring this topic a bit further though, so i'll refrain for now from asking anything else.
I'll be here as long as your curiosity holds out.
Vajradhara said:
well.. as long as it is a small corner and not too well decorated... i suppose that a Manifestation of God can disagree with me... though honestly, why they would want to is beyond me
;-) aw, let us keep the nice decorations...