- Messages
- 3,370
- Reaction score
- 1,629
- Points
- 108
Correct.But of course this information is a subject for debate.
Correct.But of course this information is a subject for debate.
Very good sounding, the challenge with interpretation is the broad words evil and good.Bible says conquer the evil with the good.
The scriptures say to even love your enemies, to pray for those that persecute you, to love your neighbor as yourself, to do unto others like you would want them to do unto you, if we consider all the scriptures I think it sheds a different light on other scriptures,
How can we be reliably sure that people will go to helpful scriptures to help them interpret more challenging or even harsher sounding scriptures?Wouldn't Paul's words be an example for us to follow?
Still going on tooThe Jewish people that followed the old law, The Greek and Hebrew Jews that believed in Jesus, The Romans, and many others considered the other religions to be heretics, each one thought they were correct and the others were heretics.
That is not in doubtDon't you think that people that give out false information comes in many shapes and sizes and uniforms?
rattle off all kinds of things about how they want to treat others like joel webbon does.
You may be better off not knowing. He's an extremist pastor. You'd have to look him up. If you want to. He's not very nice. I occasionally refer to him as an example of troubling trends in certain corners of evangelicalism, as his attitudes are extreme and harsh -but I rarely post links to him, not to give him too much traffic, and also some of his rhetoric gets into political territory which we are not doing on I/O forums anymore.I don't know this person and I don't know what he teaches.
That sounds healthy.It is not important for me to debate this point or that point, what's important to me is to explain my fundamental beliefs with scriptures alone, and then look at the other person's fundamental beliefs and the scriptures they use to explain each belief.
Clearly, as I'm afraid by singling that out, the response is the JW's New World Translation is neither accurate nor trustworthy.... still others like Jehovah's Witnesses get their information strictly from the Bible alone...
But of course this information is a subject for debate.
Clearly, as I'm afraid by singling that out, the response is the JW's New World Translation is neither accurate nor trustworthy.
I use studybible.info, Biblehub.com and Biblegateway.com I purposely use other people's Bibles because so many people feel the way you do. I wish there wasn't so much division in our thinking when we all believe in and love Christ and his Father.Clearly, as I'm afraid by singling that out, the response is the JW's New World Translation is neither accurate nor trustworthy.
So do I. Why can't everyone believe as I do!I wish there wasn't so much division in our thinking when we all believe in and love Christ and his Father.
But not the NWT, that was my point.I think you will find all religions that believe in Christ to use some or many scriptures to support their beliefs.
I use other people's Bibles anyways, so it doesn't really matter to me.But not the NWT, that was my point.
I have heard there is translation questions about the word interpreted as “eternal.” As I recall the original word (Greek?) was Eons or something like that. Some interpretations say it means a long time, but not necessarily forever. I agree that eternal damnation is inconsistent with a loving God. A loving God would allow for, and probably assist, a transformation process in which souls finally align with the Harmony of the Source, Ground of Being (Being being a harmonious wholeness in and of itself), God. I sometimes personify the I-amness, Being (as in fully being) nature of God as “BOB” (Base Of Being,” a variation of Tillich’s Ground of Being). “Hey, Bob, please help me…” Or “Dear Bob, thanks so much for…”, etc.