@Aupmanyav just argues in circles with me.
He asks for evidence, and claims that he doesn't mean "show me G-d in the flesh",
but cannot say what he does mean.
Who created God?
- Thread starter muhammad_isa
- Start date
He asks for evidence, and claims that he doesn't mean "show me G-d in the flesh",
but cannot say what he does mean.
- Messages
- 3,644
- Reaction score
- 1,737
- Points
- 108
Did you see my new thread about this - "What evidence would you accept" in Belief and Spirituality?
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
Anything that could not have happened without the intervention of a God.
For creation of universe, science has the theory of Big Bang. For emergence of life, science has RNA world.
That science is the observation of the physical universe ..
..but G-d is not physical .. so asking for physical evidence is useless.
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
Some one said if God interferes in the physical, then it is physical.
What's "it" ?
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
Your God is not a male or a female or an LGBTQ. Nor its existence has ever been proved. So how do I mention it?
In my Advaita belief, Brahman is always addressed as 'It'. So, I believe, a force of habit.
In my Advaita belief, Brahman is always addressed as 'It'. So, I believe, a force of habit.
Ah, you mean G-d, the Most Merciful..
No. G-d is not physical, despite what some might say.
"If all the trees were pens, and all the oceans ink, with seven more besides,
the words of your Lord would not be exhausted".
G-d is of an infinite nature .. He is able to create universes ad infinitum.
Should I believe His words, or yours?
I am satisfied that His words are of great wisdom, whilst you continue to ask for proof,
and ignore them. So be it.
The history of documents pertaining to the G-d of Abraham go back 1000's of years,
by various authors and reliability. People who analyse them come up with varying
conclusions, but to believe that they are all part of a giant hoax is highly improbable.
Not only that, but if it were a hoax, then existence itself is mere coincidence, with
nothing responsible for it. Hmmm, I think not!
Last edited:
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
I would not be interested in a book of a million volumes.
Your God's words or the words of Muhammad?
To you your belief.
Have you ever given a proof?
It is a hoax started by Moses, continued by Jesus and Muhammad, and the later variants.
The gullible, the superstitious and the priests/clerics are responsible for the continuation of the hoax.
That's next to impossible. Only those with little knowledge (or with bad intention) could
claim that.
The hoax is that of devils, who want to extinguish the light of faith.
The sequel is for the righteous, who acknowledge truth.
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
The hoax starts with the concept of God and ends with prophets/son/messengers/manifesttions/mahdis.
<ignore>
</ignore>
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
I have said very clearly in one of my posts that I would accept the Abrhamic God if he interchanges the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn.
Not just me, but all atheists would accept him. But the Abrahamic God does not seem to take up the challenge.
Ah .. you speak for all disbelievers.. you must be able to read their minds.
..so how would your belief in "the Abrahamic God" change your life?
What would you do differently?
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
I think if atheists get a proof they would not unnecessarily deny God/Gods/Goddesses.Ah .. you speak for all disbelievers.. you must be able to read their minds.
..so how would your belief in "the Abrahamic God" change your life?
What would you do differently?
He has not made the change of orbits. So, I remain an unbeliever.
I will go to mosque nearest to my house and pray five times a day. Rehmatullah, Barkatullah.
What for? What good would it do you?
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
Does not Rehmatullah, Barkatullah, explain it?
But I remain an atheist because the Abrahamic God does not come forward to take up the challenge.