Search results

So, one can make any story about it (visits of Jibril)? Gaps, gaps, gaps.

Yeah, I believe differently.

I do not agree to that. Science does not lay down arms. Sure, for some people belief is beneficial. I was once a believer, so I know. But belief can land one in conflicts. I do not need that belief now.

That is true. I too will die without knowing the reasons. There is no possibility that we will come to know that in five years. But I do not feel sad because of it. Things cannot be expedited. They take their own time. However, there is enough information to tell us how universe or life came...

Yeah, you are not any Tom, Dick or Harry. I know that. :)

No, I do not agree to that. Weird ideas get erased by better theories. String theory or Many-world interpretations are facing such a future.

There is no shame in not knowing. There is shame in not investigating or settling for false and convenient answers. There is no evidence that there is an edge to the universe, so why should I accept it. There is more evidence that it has none.

If we do not know, then we investigate and do not settle for whatever a Tom, Dick or Harry says.

Did I? I don't think so. I checked on him only after you mentioned the article. Sure, he is academically strong, Wikipedia says the book 'Welcome to the Univese' written by him, Neil deGrasse Tyson and J. Richard Gott mentions "why the "Big Bang model is far more than 'just a theory'". But then...

I have read Michael Strauss' article on Sean Carroll. It is not serious, it is a fun piece, between two scientists, one being an atheist and the other being a theist or just taking a pot-shot. I do not take what Strauss' says as the last word on of the universe. There could be other parallel...

There is no outside of the universe. Before our finding about CMB, we could see even less. So, the research goes on. At the moment, we can see as far as 13.8 billion years (i.e., 6 trillion x 13.8 billion miles, 82.8 billion trillion miles).

From an atheist's perspective, the first question is: "Does God/Gods/Goddesses even exist or they are just products of our imagination?" Regarding the shape of the universe, the closest IMHO would be "the surface (not on) of an expanding bubble. The bubble not being necessarily spherical".

Kindly go through one or two of these explanations at Does universe have an edge? at DuckDuckGo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe More information here: Calabi–Yau manifold - Wikipedia From very simple to extremely complex, universe may have any shape. AI generated answer...

And the truth for Bahaollah and Bahais is that 'Bahaollah is a manifestation of Allah and all need to accept his ministry'. .. otherwise as Bahaollah said: "The retribution of Allah is terrible". That does not frighten me. Bahais do not have evidence for the existence of their Allah and none...

I do not differ with you here. Science also does not look for preferred answers as the theists do. If evidence is against it, science will drop that theory. God Is. Science will say, OK, give evidence.

Everything happens in its own time. We know how it came about. The question is about creating it in a laboratory. It is Chemistry/Physics/Biology and not God. Your question shows that science was not in your school syllabus.

I am already convinced. What has getting on years done for you? Still believing in a 2,100 year old fable? :D

CMB tells us many things. No science will not be able to tell about imaginary things. God or passage of an angel. :D

I took the risk and was greeted with this: What should I do now (Don't ask me to install Windows)? Well, sure. Life has not been created in the laboratories, but it is a matter of time; the prize not withstanding. Researchers are not after money but after answers.

Why do you give such malacious links in your post? It does not speak well of a God-fearing Christian.