I think it depends on where one stands whether or not what Reb Zalman suggests is micro-scale or touching at the core of Judaism. While Integral Halachah does deal extensively with potential applications, what's more radical is the theory behind it in that it would take greater account of the individual. The actual application of halachah might look very different between one person and another. As a Reform Jew, correct me if I'm wrong about you specifically, you're probably more likely to reject the whole idea that halachah is necessary at all. For someone coming from an Orthodox background, Reb Zalman's suggestions might seem too radical.
-- Dauer
Hi Dauer, welcome back, look forward to hearing if you have some new ideas about these issues.
I need to re-calibrate my thinking here, it has been a few weeks since I read Integral Halacha, so I need to do a quick review.
You are right, on a certain level I do question the necessity for halacha. However I understand the traditional argument and even R. Zalman's argument about keep links to the traditional while developing new approaches.
I am becoming more interested in learning more about Reconstructionism, mainly because I perceive more focus on rationalism. My understanding is that Recon. is going through some transitional problems with some congregants switching to Renewal and others looking for new paths.