juantoo3
....whys guy.... ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb
Kindest Regards, Zenda!
Sometimes, doing nothing to impact the environment is detrimental to one's life or the life of one's family. Not thinning trees leads to major wildfires, for example, as the environmentalists are slowly being dragged around to see. Not killing the snake that entered the house and is threatening one's child creates a quandary of Karma; which sentient being does one allow to die? My choice would be instantaneous, save the child at the expense of the snake.
Life requires life. Chi requires chi, to exist. The trick is to keep it to a minimum. Just my thoughts.
And yet, simply by being human and alive one must impact the environment. It is a quandary. Life requires life.Zenda71 said:
Sometimes, doing nothing to impact the environment is detrimental to one's life or the life of one's family. Not thinning trees leads to major wildfires, for example, as the environmentalists are slowly being dragged around to see. Not killing the snake that entered the house and is threatening one's child creates a quandary of Karma; which sentient being does one allow to die? My choice would be instantaneous, save the child at the expense of the snake.
Life requires life. Chi requires chi, to exist. The trick is to keep it to a minimum. Just my thoughts.