I have to disagree here, Wil.The shuttle is the biggest load of crap ever sold to us.
I am a harsh critic of NASA for their mistakes, and they have made some whoppers. But on balance, NASA is the best example we have of a government success. And it has been a huge success.It was sold as this great thing that was 'reusable' what good is reusable if it costs so much more to fly than conventional. The shuttle cost nearly a half a million dollars to refit for another launch...
First of all, most of our technology today came from the Apollo program. Todays computers came out of this this program. Advances like this have helped virtually every industry.
The shuttle is expensive. Cars have been around for a hundred years and we are still improving them. Space ships only since after WWII, we are in the embryonic stages.
How well has private industry been at building space craft ?
Of course, they would let us ride for free. They know that whoever leads space technology will be leaders here on earth. It is simple.What did the russians charge us for using theirs?? 10,000 a flight??
So what ? If we develop technologies that cure cancer and others it will be worth every dollar.We spend a million to build a pen that writes in space, they use a pencil??
NASA is a huge marketing machine that has most of us hoodwinked...including you.
You are being duped by the anti-tech crowd. Think it through yourself.
Bill Gates, Buffet...two wealthiest men in the world, two biggest free market capitalists in the world...and a couple of the largest hearts in the world, give me a break. I'll listen when you contribute a couple billion.
I actually like Gates, not a fan of Buffet, he is really just a market manipulator, but at least he was smart enough to donate to the Gates Foundation.
Gates on the other hand really is a new type of business leader. He is visionary, without him we might not have PCs today. To this day when you see him speak, he is quite humble. A highly competetive individual. That is why he was so successful. His foundation, although giving away just peanuts, is doing good things. He will leave a mark in history.
Right.Madoff wasn't a capitalist, he was a thief, a criminal, stealing money with a ponzi scheme...
I disagree here, he is a product of what poorly practiced free market leads to. Greed, self serving, unethical.absolutely nothing to do with free market capitalism (oh and he was closely watched by your gov't regulators)
Enron, do you really think a secretary had earned 300 million in stocks?? Come on, who falls for these stories??
No, another example of greed, self serving and unethical. Care to discuss others ?
I never said I liked Ted, but Jane Fonda knows how to whack the conservativesOh now this is interesting, suddenly you like free market capitalists, make up your mind my brother.