the BIBLE is clear on being VEGETARIAN

He also said "Kill one in order to terrorize 10,000".

and..."Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory".

Yes, similar to what able cannidates are taught after graduation from secondary schools.

Albeit, I am usually the sardonic one . . . but, that quote seems to be optimistically inclined.

Which professional line of work acumen was Sun tzu referring to?

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Daddy, what's is a 'factory farm'? Is that like the Industrial Meat Indus-try?
Is that where Jonathon Seagull goes to work?


http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Factory_farming

chickens-in-factory-farm.jpg


Is that why they call'em 'chicks'?

arbeitmachtfrei.jpg


Work will set you free —Unless you are causing chaos upon chaos upon chaos —we can only look to the future . . . where WE will experience yet again the same old scenario.

mad-men-competition-big.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_and_Rise_of_Reginald_Perrin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nxo0fS2VMM

alas, All the hard work of generations past turned to dust —while others past the time at a distance, and have yet to "Teach their Children Well".

Any sublimation going on around here?
 
How does any of that drivel mean that the Bible is "clear on vegetarianism".

From your behavior, I would almost be inclined to conclude that Hare Krishnas are dishonest, combative, and obsessive to the point of potential mental illness.
 
For knowledge on a particular subject one must approach those who are in the know.

The "drivel" assessor in a single bound.
 
Yes, similar to what able cannidates are taught after graduation from secondary schools.

Albeit, I am usually the sardonic one . . . but, that quote seems to be optimistically inclined.

Which professional line of work acumen was Sun tzu referring to?

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Daddy, what's is a 'factory farm'? Is that like the Industrial Meat Indus-try?
Is that where Jonathon Seagull goes to work?
Wasn't trying to steal your thunder, just pointing out the good general had a lot to say about many things....(taking the whole of the context, instead of pieces here and there)
 
My mentors reason thus 3 of 5:
 

Attachments

  • 3 of 5.jpg
    3 of 5.jpg
    103.6 KB · Views: 427
My mentors reason thus 4 of 5:
 

Attachments

  • 4 of 5.jpg
    4 of 5.jpg
    99.4 KB · Views: 389
My mentors reason thus 5 of 5:
 

Attachments

  • 5 of 5.jpg
    5 of 5.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 389
i might go veggie then this year, i have given up the booze so why not meat as well. the meat industry is really gross anyway.
 
well, i think we can conclude that for all his referring to r. alkalai and r. telushkin, bhaktajan understands feck-all about judaism and the bible if he compares a factory farm to a concentration camp.

humans are not chickens.

vegetarianism is a moral choice, nobody disputes that, but aside from the need to treat animals with respect, there's no reason we can't eat meat.

b'shalom

bananabrain
 
vegetarianism is a moral choice, . . . there's no reason we can't eat meat.

"I am afraid . . . we are afraid . . . self-loathing . . . beast-a-cides":

It is about the karma.
It is about the karma.
It is about the karma.

What's the arguement-debate about karma?
What's the arguement-debate about "Thar ain't to karma over hunting & eating the kill"?
What's the arguement-debate about "Do not kill" karma-repricuscion?

What's up with the visceral denial about the laws of karma?

Who says: I don't need no freaking karma! I am beyond karma!

Right?

Ya'll are beyond karma?
Ya'll are beyond karma?
Ya'll are beyond karma?

I am afraid that such advocates don't appreciate those that
"Suffer karma" . . .

or, should it be said that "such advocates who Suffer karma make the world go 'round".

Philosophy without acknowledging the 'perilous bestial terrafirma that we bi-peds thread while idealising 5 better ways to sense-gratify our selves' ---does not make for canidates to meet God-face to face.

Hey, I learnt this while watching the movie "The Love Guru" with Mike Myers:

B - basis
I - instructions
B - before
L - leaving
E - earth.
 
well, i think we can conclude that for all his referring to r. alkalai and r. telushkin, bhaktajan understands feck-all about judaism and the bible if he compares a factory farm to a concentration camp.

humans are not chickens.

vegetarianism is a moral choice, nobody disputes that, but aside from the need to treat animals with respect, there's no reason we can't eat meat.

b'shalom

bananabrain


No concentration camps for chickens. (?)
And only factory farms for Humans. (?)

vegetarianism is a moral choice, nobody disputes that
Choose "Moral" . . . from what other option?
**"Im-moral"?




[**FYI: the 'written word-pun':

Im-moral ~ I'm moral

was coincidental]
 
bhaktajan, try and post in your own words, without being abusive please.

I'm looking at the images you've posted and wondering why I shouldn't remove them - rather than argu the point about what the Bible says by referencing the Bible, you've simply published a couple of emotive photographs, and then scanned in pages of a Hare Krishna book to explain your point.

Please, do let us know your point, in a civilised manner, without ranting in your own little world away from the point thank you.
 
bhaktajan, try and post in your own words, without being abusive please.

I'm looking at the images you've posted and wondering why I shouldn't remove them - rather than argu the point about what the Bible says by referencing the Bible, you've simply published a couple of emotive photographs, and then scanned in pages of a Hare Krishna book to explain your point.

Please, do let us know your point, in a civilised manner, without ranting in your own little world away from the point thank you.

What are you talking about I Brian?

You have interrupted me on several occasions with your fascile style of mis-direction, and here you are again doing the same.

There are scholars who argue the case that I am bringing up for consideration.

bhaktajan, try and post in your own words, without being abusive please

I never use abusive words. My posts are my own words ---otherwise I will give credit to whom ever I have quoted.

My Post #73 is a direct rebuttal that highlights the most important points to be considered. It's the Karma sweetheart. [you see, Sweatheart harkens to the reverse case senario ---dis-compassionate whimisical speculators]

I'm looking at the images you've posted and wondering why I shouldn't remove them

It's 5 consecutive pages from a book called "Holy Cow" by Steven Rosen.
That is evident from looking at the scanned documents. The photos located exactly as they are in the book ---Page 91 to 102 are pictures.

you've simply published a couple of emotive photographs, and then scanned in pages of a Hare Krishna book to explain your point.

The photos appear in the book exactly where they are located in the book.

One is Krishna, who, BTW, is known as "Govinda" & "Gopala" ---"Pleaser of the Cows"

The other picture is an orthodox Hindu Guru ---who teaches all Yoga students that the Cow is Sacred and that to kill and eat the cow brings all sorts of in-auspiciousness to society and to mis-informed Yoga Students.

I am in agreement with the stance that meat eating causes crazy barbaric culture doomed to enter war . . . this fact elludes 99.99% of the world's population.

I disagree with your taking exception with me.
have you contributed to this thread? Both you and Banana have ganged up on me with out adding to the esoteric topic.

It's an esoteric topic.

I am alone with pundits explaining this.

The abuse is Post #72. It is 100% flaming ---then on top of that you jump on me too.

Please, do let us know your point, in a civilised manner, without ranting in your own little world away from the point thank you

I don't rant.
Each of my utterances are references to real-life-taken-for-granted facts of life.

My advise is to directly question any of my statements to learn the through-line.

Bad Karma amongst the impoverished & suffering is often looked over by those in the upper stratums of society.

If you don't think I am writting in a coherent logical sincere spiritually educated fashion ----then you'd ignore me.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
It is propagated that meat eaters do not possess the compassion needed to understand vegetarianism. Did you know that?

My opinion is predicated upon world known scholars ---that is what the scanned pictures prove.
 
vegetarianism is a moral choice, nobody disputes that, but aside from the need to treat animals with respect, there's no reason we can't eat meat.

b'shalom

bananabrain

Our own dietary choices are, or can be whatever we may want (or afford, or have access to). However I do think important, practical consequences are arising from such choices. The world's population is vastly increasing and the increased demand for meat from (especially) China is placing greater and greater strain on world meat production. International research is showing the deliterious effect this is having on the planet.

s.
 
See my article on Mandrake root, cannibalism, and the original sin (when I am able to post it that is)

Yes meat was originally bad before the fall at the very least.
 
Our own dietary choices are, or can be whatever we may want (or afford, or have access to). However I do think important, practical consequences are arising from such choices. The world's population is vastly increasing and the increased demand for meat from (especially) China is placing greater and greater strain on world meat production. International research is showing the deliterious effect this is having on the planet.

s.
Meat was a staple in very few areas of the world. It was only the rich and royal that ate enough of it to get gout and issues of overconsumption. The reason a ham bone was put in soup is that that may have been all the meat you got, you saved it, it was the side dish, the rice/potatoes/bread/greens were the staples, meat was shared sparingly and used for flavor in the soups and stews.

No more, we put giant slabs of flesh on our plate, and consume huge amounts. The amount of grain and grass and water that it takes to raise these animals is rediculous....well it is obvious isn't it, rather than feed a cow or pig, we could feed a human. Meat production wastes resources, we could easily feed a planet with ten times the number of people, it we raising meat. (not to mention the issue with all the waste they create)

Yes meat was originally bad before the fall at the very least.
So the molecular structure of flesh changed?
 
Back
Top