Now I could say we've all incarnated into the human community....
Or we could say according to the various stories there were many....
The Bible mentions Melchisideck as having no parents, of which Jesus was labeled a priest in his order....
the only begotten of the continually begotten
By that definition, no to Buddha, Moses and Jesus.
I kinda sorta like what my bride has to say "they are all the same soul, so are we but we don't know it yet." Bright lady, even if she had the poor taste to marry (and stay with) me.
Love, Radarmark
Hi donnann,Maybe I should have first defined my defination of incarnation. To me incarnation is when a heavenly being is sent into the human body for the purpose, a mission of sorts from GOD to help humanity in some way.
By that definition, no to Buddha, Moses and Jesus.
No that would be a no.I believe thats a yes
I have sent you saviors. Does anyone think that he was the only one that incarnated into the human community?
No that would be a no.
No that would be a no.
its only the christians out of the abrahamics that believe Jesus was divine isnt it ?
There are jews for jesus. The name JESUS taken back to the jewish comparison is 888 which refers to the last man adam the human body becoming one with its spirit and soul. The christian concept of jesus is that when he took on a human body in the separated condition of non oneness that when that human body rose with his prehuman divine body that the human body was no longer separated. So then you have a divine being with his divine body that was never separated from his soul and spirit but also his human body that became one with the human soul and spirit and the power to use either. Now do the jews believe that the man jesus was this fulfillment of this prophecy..some do.
No that would be a no.
Now I could say we've all incarnated into the human community....
Or we could say according to the various stories there were many....
The Bible mentions Melchisideck as having no parents, of which Jesus was labeled a priest in his order....
the only begotten of the continually begotten
No that would be a no.
Sorry I should explain what I mean. Picture this. A divine being talking to say GOD that is being sent by the father to earth above a place that conception is going to take place. As soon as the sperm and egg unite the divine being is sent down into the egg and then sealed in it. This is why incarnated beings are always a series of miracles involving the body which are seal openings and bindings. I hope this makes sense to you.
Probably the reference is to the "gematria", an ancient system of alphabetic numberals in which the letters are divided into three series of nine each, standing for 1-9, 10-90, 100-900 (extra letters are needed to bring the set up to 27). "Yeshua" was yod-shin-waw-'ayin = 10+300+6+70 = 386. I don't know what spelling is used to get "888" out of it.I understand his hebrew name was Yeshua not Jesus and how do any of these relate to 888 and what is the significance of 888 ?
Probably the reference is to the "gematria", an ancient system of alphabetic numberals in which the letters are divided into three series of nine each, standing for 1-9, 10-90, 100-900 (extra letters are needed to bring the set up to 27). "Yeshua" was yod-shin-waw-'ayin = 10+300+6+70 = 386. I don't know what spelling is used to get "888" out of it.
EDIT: got it. Greek was "Iehsous" iota-eta-sigma-omicron-upsilon-sigma = 10+8+200+70+400+200