Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heaven?

Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

Maybe in your world, not in my (Christian) world.

We believe the Incarnation is a divine nature manifesting Itself in and through human nature ...

God bless,

Thomas

Which is basically the definition of enlightenment, except that it isn't an incarnation, it is a descending of the divine along with an ascension of the human. The result of that meeting can be called a Manifestation of God...
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

Perhaps, but the Incarnation as understood of Jesus is different from the gods who walked among men ... so whilst that statement might be generally correct, once you look into the theological claims, and the metaphysucal principle, then no, I think in that instance Jesus Christ as the Incarnate Son of God and Second Person of the Blessed Trinity is unique.

God bless,

Thomas

Jesus did not walk among men?

The problem is that theologians are not enlightened themselves, so their words are essentially a nonsense. For me, man ought to collect text from legitimately enlightened people and learn from them all, not pick one and read all the commentary available on him.
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

what makes anyone think He (Yeshua the Nazarene) WAS incarnated (OP definition: a heavenly being sent into the human body for the purpose, a mission of sorts from GOD to help humanity in some way.), in the first place?
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

There are no miracles and everything is a miracle....depending on your definition.
Quite.

I believe that as well as
Which? You can't have both without reducing the terms to nothing.

We are all divine, all incarnate, or none of us are...depending on your definition.
Quiote.

The point then is, definitions are really important. Either words meaning something, or they are just noise ...

God bless,

Thomas
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

I have sent you saviors. Does anyone think that he was the only one that incarnated into the human community?

A problem with this question for Baha'is is that we don't see Jesus as a "heavenly being".. Jesus was a Prophet of God a Manifestation of God.. He is not God incarnate..We do not feel that God physically incarnated Himself, rather He a Manifestation of God...The Light of God in Him. So were there other Manifestations? In our view yes indeed.. We include Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, the Bab and Baha'u'llah/
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

The father is not begotten, so there was never a beginning... cool, whatever, logic and religion rarely coincide.
I do smile when people assume that things they don't understand are necessarily illogical because they don't understand them ...

What exactly was God doing before he created the Universe?
Ah, the 'what came before God' question.

Your question comes from what you would describe as an unenlightened dualist outlook.

There is no 'before' or 'after' in God, nor was there a 'before' or 'after' this Cosmos ... so the question doesn't apply.

Why did he decide to create this existence?
The one question science will never be able to answer is 'why is there anything at all?'

For myself, I have an answer that suits me, that is reasonable, rational, and logical, being founded on my understanding of the Blessed Trinity ... suffice to say therefore, I could not begin to begin explaining that to you" for reasons that are evident from prior discussion — you're asking for the meat when you're not weaned off the milk, and you can't even digest that!

Where ... Was ...
I don't know what definition of deity you're assuming, but mine places the divine outside of any spatiotemporal condition ...

... God bored in heaven?"
That's just silly.

Also, if the Father and Son are One, how can one beget the other? I'm confused.
Again, 'one' when speaking of the divine can only be analogous, as 'one' as you see it implies number/multiplicity and your into spatiotemporality again.

When it boils down to it, none of this really matters at all, it is not going to help anything, it just appeases our intellects so we can move onto the next question. That is all such statements can ever do: create more questions.
True ... but then we are but human, after all, and if we were to stop asking questions, we'd have never climbed down from the trees.

We are not omniscient, nor infallible. Questions have their place, but I do agree that mere knowledge is not what it's all about ...

Blessed are they who just get on with it ... but not blessed are they who bury their talents in a field.

God bless,

Thomas
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

lucifer in English Gematria Equals: 444
lucifer in Simple Gematria Equals: 74
jesus in English Gematria Equals: 444
jesus in Simple Gematria Equals: 74

:eek:

What letter->number codings are you using here?
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

I do smile when people assume that things they don't understand are necessarily illogical because they don't understand them ...

You have mistaken logic and understanding... I understand fine, and thus know it cannot be distilled into logical form with anything resembling accuracy. It is just your mind making sense in its limited way, and thus your understanding is going to be limited.

Ah, the 'what came before God' question.

Your question comes from what you would describe as an unenlightened dualist outlook.

There is no 'before' or 'after' in God, nor was there a 'before' or 'after' this Cosmos ... so the question doesn't apply.

Yet the Son has been begotten by the Father, both are one God though... explain.

The one question science will never be able to answer is 'why is there anything at all?'

For myself, I have an answer that suits me, that is reasonable, rational, and logical, being founded on my understanding of the Blessed Trinity ... suffice to say therefore, I could not begin to begin explaining that to you" for reasons that are evident from prior discussion — you're asking for the meat when you're not weaned off the milk, and you can't even digest that!

Why is this answer necessary at all to arrive at? It is impossible to know for certain, and more to the point, it is irrelevant to anything meaningful on the spiritual path.

I don't know what definition of deity you're assuming, but mine places the divine outside of any spatiotemporal condition ...

Then your God is even less infinite...


God bored in heaven? That's just silly.

Well then it seems even the Christians cannot answer why everything has occurred, except for a being with no beginning suddenly saying a word for no apparent reason. In the Bible is says he wished to be loved, but why if he was already content? If he was not content, I would recommend your God send for Buddha to come and help him.

Again, 'one' when speaking of the divine can only be analogous, as 'one' as you see it implies number/multiplicity and your into spatiotemporality again.

You do not understand, I know God, I can make the same statement Jesus has made "I and God are one". In reality, this statement merely shows your own lack of ability to answer.

True ... but then we are but human, after all, and if we were to stop asking questions, we'd have never climbed down from the trees.

lol... so now you're telling us monkeys think? How will they ask the question without language?

Blessed are they who just get on with it ... but not blessed are they who bury their talents in a field.

This for me appears to be an admittance that you actually know nothing at all outside what your organization has provided.

It is of course part of the draw of Christianity, you get to be utterly lazy. You simply do your obligation to humanity and you think this gets you into heaven, it is what you should be doing anyway to show gratitude for the life you have been given but you want a reward for it - they provide infinite pleasure in heaven. In return, you don't actually have to do anything, you do not even believe you have the potential to be another Christ within you. He has already done everything necessary, why see your own potential first hand?

There is no other faith which is so utterly removed from the very foundation of religion: mysticism, the core to every faith. You have successfully gotten rid of the mystic groups that sprung up around Christ, so now the Vatican is free to enslave human kind and they did a very good job of that for some 17-18 hundred years.

I have no problem with Jesus, I know him personally and love him dearly, I have a huge problem with the religion of Paul though.
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

Lunitik —

On the one hand:
I understand fine ...
On the other:
Yet the Son has been begotten by the Father, both are one God though... explain.
Your second comment contradicts the first.

So your whole argument is invalid.

Here's a thing, instead of wasting my time asking questions to which your not interested in the answers, other than to use another opportunity to make claim to a superior intellect and deeper spiritual insight and being ... why don't you do something really useful, something really beneficial, something really meaningful, and enlighten me with regard to any one of the following:
1: Theosis (Gk) or divinisation in relation to trinitarian metaphysics, or
2: The meaning of perichoreisis (Gk) / circumincession (Lt) in the same, or
3: The meaning of 'mystery' in the Christian Tradition.

Then, instead of just talk, you can actually demonstrate it; you can walk the walk, as it were ... talk is cheap, after all.

God bless,

Thomas
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

ooooh! ooooooh! Big old IMPORTANT words. Returning to the path or not missing the mark through understanding of the Father and the Son. John 17:21's cleaving togther. And the unity of the former?
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav


Ah, thanks. The "simple" gematria just assigns 1-26 to the letters (not 1-9, 10-90, 100-900 as in the ancient systems; requires you to fill out the alphabet to 27 letters) while the "English" gematria just multiplies them all by 6, which makes it easier to hit "666", and also guarantees that any words which match according to the "simple" system also match by the "English" system.
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

1: Theosis (Gk) or divinisation in relation to trinitarian metaphysics

The trinity is actually one of my favorite devices, despite how much I talk negatively on Christianity. One of the simplest ways to understand it is as follows (and I believe your Church Fathers have originated this particular notion):

beloved (father), lover (son), and love (holy spirit).

Beloved is of course the object, lover is the subject, and love is the connection. When this love is felt deeply enough, there is a merging which occurs, now only the love remains for object and subject are one. This merging is referred to as theosis in Christianity, but the Sufi's use the same device as do the Hindu's. In that merging is what is referred to often as a transcending of duality, this is why Jesus goes on saying "I and my father are one", it is literally true after this "event".

2: The meaning of perichoreisis (Gk) / circumincession (Lt) in the same

This is a very simply concept, although the East focuses primarily only on one aspect of this: that God resides in each of us. This is the very nature of meditation, to look within and find the divine that is our very essence.

Of course, the reverse is also true: we reside within God as God is the whole. Very very basic, yet you seem to feel these concepts are profound and unique? You will of course find ways to prove my statements are not complete, yet in actuality I have even over-complicated them as language is ripe to do...

3: The meaning of 'mystery' in the Christian Tradition.

I could really care less about traditions and ritual, and this is what you discuss here: the eucharist, the trinity, etc. Life itself is the mystery, trying to pigeon hole that, trying to limit the scope of that, ritualizing instead of experiencing - it is all just toys for the foolish to play with.

The real mystery is only experienced when you can once again look on the world with the wonder of a child, in utter amazement towards all. When you can see God is everything you encounter, as has already been discussed must be the case since we reside in him. Now you live the mystery, now the entire earth is a temple and everything within it is valid for worship. As the Sufi's say: nothing exists save God. When you know this, when this is your experience, then you know the mystery, until then you know nothing.
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

In reality the answer to each question is: Oneness - not two, never separated.
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

Ah, thanks. The "simple" gematria just assigns 1-26 to the letters (not 1-9, 10-90, 100-900 as in the ancient systems; requires you to fill out the alphabet to 27 letters) while the "English" gematria just multiplies them all by 6, which makes it easier to hit "666", and also guarantees that any words which match according to the "simple" system also match by the "English" system.
Thus, in my mind, rendering ALL forms of Numerology to be just another delusional facet of over-thinking
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

In reality the answer to each question is: Oneness - not two, never separated.
Of course this is in YOUR reality.
Though I admit in my Belief the LHP is seeking this Oneness/Singularity as well. Though in comparison it will take the conscious effort of spiritual separation to attain.
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

Of course this is in YOUR reality.
Though I admit in my Belief the LHP is seeking this Oneness/Singularity as well. Though in comparison it will take the conscious effort of spiritual separation to attain.

Underlined is exactly why it isn't your reality as well ;)

It also isn't an attainment, it will take effort but it is already the case - the effort is simply to remove the damage society has done.
 
Re: Was JESUS the only heavenly being to incarnate into the human community from heav

Underlined is exactly why it isn't your reality as well ;)

It also isn't an attainment, it will take effort but it is already the case - the effort is simply to remove the damage society has done.
Oh no you are gravely mistaken, I am very enlightened, way more than you have become. How do I know this? Well, I just stated it, didn't I?

It also isn't an attainment, it will take effort but it is already the case - the effort is simply to remove the damage society has done.
what the heck does that even mean? effort removing societal baggage to attain something is not attaining something?

Really, I have never in my 50 yrs on earth listened to anyone not make sense so well.
 
Back
Top