donnann vs. Science

I like the O one. Do you know what happens if one mixes RH Neg and RH Pos... death. Happened a lot in early transfusions (since Europe is really the only continent with a significant amount of RH Neg types, probably a left-over from Neaderthals, Aisans, Native Americans and Africans are typically << 1% Rh Neg).

Pax et amore omnia vincunt!
The DNA of the blood type on the Shroud of Turin is AB blood type . . . oops :D
 
This isn't really going anywhere, we can't argue with donnann as we would with people who rely on evidence. Like Lunitik, donnann can always fall back to "I know this for a fact", I really see no point in putting her in that corner.
 
This isn't really going anywhere, we can't argue with donnann as we would with people who rely on evidence. Like Lunitik, donnann can always fall back to "I know this for a fact", I really see no point in putting her in that corner.

Well what do you want me to do to prove it, I cant go get the shroud and bring it to you for testing can I?
 
Well, I personally wouldn't claim anything that I can't prove, but that's because I'm more agnostic then anything.
I personally have a lot of respect for people who state their faith from their own point of view and not as absolutes, like "I believe that" or "In my faith we think that". For the simple reason that we are human and we are flawed, how we experience and interpret the world can be flawed. We do the best we can, but can't KNOW what we say is true, only feel it.

These are my opinions!

But lets go back to the bats or the blood. With the blood, where did you find that there are O neutral blood? And with the bats, can you tell me where you found the information about them being able to become birds again?
 
Let's begin with 'who has the real shroud'?

See heres the facts. No one on earth can have a human child with an incarnated divine being even though in human condtion and produce say for example the O type. It will always produce partials. If say a male incarnated and his human body had O blood but his wife had O - the children will not have O. Say a female incarnated and had children and the father had A+ the children will have A+.
 
The vatican.
The Shroud of Turin is kept in the royal chapel of the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in Turin, northern Italy. But, you are saying this is not the 'real' Shroud, that the Vatican has this . . . I have never read this, and cannot find any evidence of this online or in any online newspaper archive . . . . how do you know this?
 
The Shroud of Turin is kept in the royal chapel of the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in Turin, northern Italy. But, you are saying this is not the 'real' Shroud, that the Vatican has this . . . I have never read this, and cannot find any evidence of this online or in any online newspaper archive . . . . how do you know this?

You may not believe this by sometimes I just know things.
 
The Shroud of Turin is kept in the royal chapel of the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in Turin, northern Italy. But, you are saying this is not the 'real' Shroud, that the Vatican has this . . . I have never read this, and cannot find any evidence of this online or in any online newspaper archive . . . . how do you know this?
Dave Matthews Band - The Space Between - YouTube

The girl in this song reminds me of myself, the girl in the water and one who walks up at the end is the same girl, reminds me of myself....
 
I'm guessing you won't budge on the Bible being a legitimate source so I'm guessing we should just let that one go?

ACOT - imagine that all of your family believed the Bible was the ultimate source of "facts". And that they want to convert you to Christianity, based on this "evidence". And have been trying to do so for 20 years :)

I must admit, it is a good teacher of patience to deal with folks that fall back on a 2,000 year-old book as the "absolute truth". At least that's what I keep telling myself :D
 
ACOT - imagine that all of your family believed the Bible was the ultimate source of "facts". And that they want to convert you to Christianity, based on this "evidence". And have been trying to do so for 20 years :)

I must admit, it is a good teacher of patience to deal with folks that fall back on a 2,000 year-old book as the "absolute truth". At least that's what I keep telling myself :D

Well when it was written they probably looked more like birds than they do know....
 
I haven't been here for a while, and I thought, on first reading, that the OP'er was being a snide...

and yet...

"bats are birds"...

fair play...

I want to know what a cuckow is... is, that like a hybrid cuckoo/cow cross?

If it is, then I'm siding with the bible-nut: 'tis an ABOMINATION!

Maybe sufferable in gravy..?
 
Back
Top