Truth

That means you go one step further than Buddha in saying that there is no true reality. Buddha reserved his words on reality but said that the observed is because of 'co-dependent origination'. Even if it all arises from 'nothing', that is the true reality.
 
Aupmanyav said:
That means you go one step further than Buddha in saying that there is no true reality. Buddha reserved his words on reality but said that the observed is because of 'co-dependent origination'. Even if it all arises from 'nothing', that is the true reality.
Click to expand...

That which observes the thoughts, sees the world, only that is real.
 
Aupmanyav said:
That which observes the thoughts, sees the world; is unreal; illusion, maya, anatta. Brahman does not.
Click to expand...

If you point at something and say "this is the observer", it is certainly false.

Why? It is because something is there observing this.

Brahman does not observe the world because Brahman is the world. Realizing there is nothing which is actually you through trying to find a concrete observer, you realize the illusion was ever that you were separate.

Yet, if Brahman is not partaking of the play, for whom is leela?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top