A Cup Of Tea
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,313
- Reaction score
- 580
- Points
- 108
A lot of the discussion revolves around the 'Nothing' before the 'Something' and how the latter came about out of nothing. On this forum I remember discussions forming around either the idea of nothingness and a divine action or the something emerging out of something else, the latter being nicknamed 'turtles all the way down'. In the above discussion there is a similar dichotomy where the physicists try to scale away the 'Something' while the the philosopher persists that there is more to take away.
The universe is wonderfully complicated and I think these are questions for humans to grasp because we have no experience with Nothingness and Infinity. Biologically or socially there haven't been any practical need for them. Since we all know what we talk about it's very likely that we can comprehend them, but I would like to postulate that it could be that we either don't have the mental capacity to truly understand Nothingness and Infinity, or that the concepts simply only exist in our mind. In either case what we understand is simply a crude shadow of reality. Neither of them are measurable in any case.
Around 1h 27min into the video Seife points out how similar Nothingness and Infinity are as concepts as when you take something away or add something to either you still end up the same. The both depend on the 'Something' that is all around us always, what we are programmed to actually comprehend. Nothingness is the absence of something where the mind is trying to (infinitely) take away the something, and Infinity is the endless 'Something' where the mind is trying to (infinitely) add something. Like turtles.
I think it's worth pointing out for perspective. And no matter if there is Nothingness and Infinity, or if we can comprehend it or not, is it not conceivable that there is a third answer to the question besides Nothingness and Infinity that we haven't conceived yet?