That is a common argument of the non-believers, but doesn't really hold true to religious teachings (scriptural speaking). Yes we are created in God's image, that doesn't mean we are just like him. just as no Abrahamic faith believes God's powers are achievable by man (ok I admit, there might be a few sub denominations that differ), we don't believe we inherit all of his attributes nor all of his power or wisdom. it's easy to make that blanket statement, but seeing the underlying meaning is much more simple. We are all made with his word, the difference in mud and life is his word. His word is a part of him. His "Image" in this case is like a piece of his power (aka life) which he gave. That phrase has been used to cover everything from sin to art, yet we know from the same book, that God has no physical image.If I were to be provocative I would say that if we are talking about the Abrahamic God, we are made in his image. Therefor how we act is a reflection of that God. That so many of us act in hateful ways, and most of humanity has done so down thru the centuries, seems to me that all of that negativity is contained within God too. Or we wouldn't be so adept at it.
I have a question that I would like everybody to weigh in. God loves everybody but still some people don't cherish that and have hate in their hearts. Why????
Well done that man!Why do people constantly blame God for all that is wrong in the world while readily taking credit for all that is good? Every major religion there is spells out quite clearly the guidelines God has set forth for us to follow. Don't blame God for the consequences of man's own stupidity and arrogance for not following them. God loved us enough to give us free will to choose right from wrong. Even going so far as to tell us the difference and the effect of following each. It's man that has made the wrong choices in spite of that, adversely affecting innocent people. Not God!
Don't blame God for the consequences of man's own stupidity and arrogance for not following them.
I don't know that their is a default position as you put it, we are simply free to choose one way or the other. From where I sit though, there's more good in the world than bad. Doesn't seem that way at times I know, especially to those on the receiving end of conflict, but all in all. So why do some follow the path of evil? There's just no simple answer, but pride has a lot to do with it. Afterall that was Satan's downfall. Pride in one's self has prevented many a man from admitting when he's wrong, taking more credit than he's due and expecting more than he's entitled. When man relies on himself rather than God, Satan's influence reigns supreme.My question to this argument is why did God make humans the kind of creature that would default to their baser natures so much more often than their better natures. I get the whole 'choice on how we act is ours to make' declaration. Don't even disagree with that per se. But God could have made us any way he wanted. So why not make our species lean to our brighter sides more often than not?
This is the view of Islam as well. We also believe all children are born knowing knowing God and the correct path, but in our frailty of mind at the age are taught away from it.I truly believe we're born innocent and good. Evil and hate are learned outside the womb.
not determined, theorized. we have no knowledge of what goes on in a newborn's head, and everything it sees, hears, touches, or tastes from the point of birth is its teacher. a baby raised in the wild will learn from the earth around it. If animals support it, it will learn from them. It would even learn from the animals that wish to do it harm. There is no way to test it, it is a pure matter of faith.I believe the science that has studied such things have determined that we are neither good nor evil at birth.
Back at you, RE#10. The only thing I would add is, I think people do lean toward good rather than evil, but these days the line between good and evil has become muddled in the name of political correctness. I think in light of that many fail to exercise their personal free will and simply go along.Well done that man!
Fascinating link.Actually Joe, it seems the latest studies do suggest that even very young infants do have a moral compass. The blank slate concept which I have believed for a long time is apparently giving way to completely different theories. So with the facts at hand at this time I must acknowledge that my post #12 is incorrect.
http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/features/research-on-infant-morality
This's true. Easier to go along than think for yourself I suppose.Back at you, RE#10. The only thing I would add is, I think people do lean toward good rather than evil, but these days the line between good and evil has become muddled in the name of political correctness. I think in light of that many fail to exercise their personal free will and simply go along.
That is quite fascinating. And even though I agree with the theory it produced, I'm not sure the study if very conclusive. Of course this isn't the actual paper that was written or showing of any of the raw data. Interesting though.Actually Joe, it seems the latest studies do suggest that even very young infants do have a moral compass. The blank slate concept which I have believed for a long time is apparently giving way to completely different theories. So with the facts at hand at this time I must acknowledge that my post #12 is incorrect.
http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/features/research-on-infant-morality