Absolute-ness means...

bhaktajan said:
I give proper time to replying.

But for now a quick one:

I posted:
Coke-a-cola is a recipe. If we travel to the far side of the universe, the recipe would be the same.
Since you couldn't make heads or tails of what this meant I have ammended the same example but with something that may make my point clear:
The English Language is a recipe. If we travel to the far side of the universe, the English Language would be the same.
Click to expand...

Apples and oranges, friend. Further, do you seriously consider British English, Canadian English, American English and Australian English to be absolutely identical? I don't think so, there are many instances of speakers between these that miscommunicate...would you light up my ***? Then you have dialects and sub-culture lingo...how you could make the statement that English or *any* language is homogenous everywhere displays an incredibly narrow point of view. It is no wonder you cannot comprehend anything I've written when your mind is such a closed book.

Jauntoo, could you state what it is that you do recognise as ABSOLUTE? What constitutes an ABSOLUTE?
Click to expand...

I have already responded at length Bkahjatan, you do not wish to recognize my extensive replies...that is not my problem. You cannot see what is right in front of your face, there is no need for me to continue wasting my effort.

My note on the nature of Duality:
Show me a coin . . . and I'll show you it's flip-side.
Click to expand...

Now you wish to posit opinion as fact? I think my purpose is completed here.
 
Last edited:
Since you couldn't comprehend what this meant I have amended it to make my point clear:
Take "Apples and oranges". If we travel to the far side of the universe, the Apples and oranges would be the same.

Why after so much post wont you highlight where we agree? ---Jauntoo, please state what it in your opinion is ABSOLUTE? What constitutes an ABSOLUTE?

The topic of the Thread is "What is ABSOLUTE?"
 
bhaktajan said:
I POSTED THE OP TO GET RESPONDENTS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE EXISTS THE IDEA THAT “ABSOLUTES” DO EXIST.
THUS, THE NEXT THING TO DO IS NAME AT LEAST ONE ABSOLUTE.
OTOH, IF SOMEONE SAYS NAY! NONE SUCH THING! …THEN LET ‘EM SAY HOW-COME(?).

juantoo3 said:
I have, and I did, and you don't want to hear the answers.
It all comes down to which paradigm "you" (not just you personally, all of us) put stock in.

IS THIS YOUR ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY A SINGLE ABSOLUTE?

 
HEY THIS MAY BE RELATIBLE:

To make my point clear:

Take a "Male". If we travel to the far side of the universe, the "Male" would still be a "Male"?
 
Duality is a law of creation.

ABSOLUTES exist because it is one of the polarities of Duality.
 
juantoo3 said:
folks attempt to defend their religious traditions ... And I will not say religious outlooks are incorrect, but they absolutely are *not* scientific, and therefore are not "truth"

bhaktajan said:
Do you think I have been discussing Religion with you?
 
THIS GOTTA BE RELATIBLE:

To make my point clear:

Take a "Dead Person in a coffin". Take the Dead Person in a coffin to the far side of the universe, the "Dead Person in a coffin" would still be a exactly the same "Dead Person in a coffin"?
 
juantoo3 said:
Apples and oranges, friend. Further, do you seriously consider British English, Canadian English, American English and Australian English to be absolutely identical? I don't think so, there are many instances of speakers between these that miscommunicate...would you light up my ***? Then you have dialects and sub-culture lingo...how you could make the statement that English or *any* language is homogenous everywhere displays an incredibly narrow point of view. It is no wonder you cannot comprehend anything I've written when your mind is such a closed book.

I have already responded at length Bkahjatan, you do not wish to recognize my extensive replies...that is not my problem. You cannot see what is right in front of your face, there is no need for me to continue wasting my effort.

Now you wish to posit opinion as fact? I think my purpose is completed here.
Click to expand...

So shall I agree, with you, that 1] you are the instructor speaking clearly "What the Lesson is all about"?

And 2] that I cannot grasp Jauntoo's explanations?

and 3] If I conceed to the above two items ... I would be enlightened to the facts, and I would be a good student?
 
bhaktajan said:
juantoo3 said:
folks attempt to defend their religious traditions ... And I will not say religious outlooks are incorrect, but they absolutely are *not* scientific, and therefore are not "truth"

bhaktajan said:
Do you think I have been discussing Religion with you?
Click to expand...
The lowest of the low, to misquote me out of context and then hide pieces of what I did say in some effort to smear my name just to "win" your petty little game.

I did think of you as just another zealot, but still held out respect due to a fellow human traveller...now I have lost all respect for you whatsoever. Anyone who has to lie to make their point, it not worth discussing with. Thank you for showing your true colors.

For the record, what I *did* write in post 59:
juantoo3 said:
And I will not say religious outlooks are incorrect, but they absolutely are *not* scientific, and therefore are not "truth" in the sense of "observed reality."
Click to expand...

I hope you find what you are looking for.

I'm out.
 
Last edited:
IMO

What Juantoo3 *did* write in post 59:
And I will not say religious outlooks are incorrect, but they absolutely are *not* scientific, and therefore are not "truth" in the sense of "observed reality."

has exactly the same meaning as:

folks attempt to defend their religious traditions ... And I will not
say religious outlooks are incorrect, but they absolutely are *not* scientific, and therefore
not "truth" in the sense of "observed reality."

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

So as you you can read clearly "observed reality" is difficult to observe if you ignore the research.

He is my subjective experience with the replies on this thread. I was preached down to incessantly and my maxims ignored and every single talking point re-directed to a parallel discussion.

So my banter irks anyone.
 
Here is my subjective experience with ...
Sorry my banter irks anyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top