If i tell them "it's a practice commanded by G!D" and stop there, then i'm telling them nothing new really.
oh, i know, but to insist on rational justifications for everything is to miss the point of faith in Divine commandment - in my book it's tantamount to what you guys call
shirk
The medical aspects of the matter was to increase some knowledge in the matter cause alot of people think that it is simply unnecessary or is unhygienic or just downright mutilation.
i do understand what you're saying; i just think there's a difference between *refuting* a claim that something is unhygienic in medical terms and explicitly stating medical justification. that can potentially leave you open to counter-refutations by people who know more about medicine than you do - and, moreover, you're turning it from a religious question to a medical one and, in such a question, to the rational observer, medical opinion will naturally be more authoritative. that's all i'm saying - i don't think you and i actually disagree about this. i just think there are problems with justification of religious practices drawing on authority from outside the religion, but this approach:
Questions are often asked cause people are curious as to WHY G!D has commanded a certain thing. Questions are encouraged and answers given.
i have absolutely no problem with questions being encouraged and discussion resulting from it, but EASY ANSWERS are another thing. if you tell someone that, say, halal is "scientifically provable to be more conducive to animal welfare", what do you do when somebody brings a *scientific* proof that it isn't? do you, as a non-scientist (i assume, like me) start to argue about science? we run the risk of making ourselves look ridiculous in scientific terms, never mind religious ones. i also have a problem with simple answers. in my view, both islam and judaism are complex, sophisticated, integrated systems and increased faith comes from an appreciation of the power and sophistication of the thought that went into them, both human and Divine, not from parlour tricks which are meant to show the superiority of religious thought.
G!D has told us what to do and it is our duty to say 'O Lord, we hear and we obey'. What i have spoken of comes afterwards i.e. the 'why was this command given' .. in the meantime, we are not disobeying, we are still following the command.
this principle is called in judaism
na'aseh ve-nishmah which is actually *doing* *before* understanding. it's completely counterintuitive (at least to a secularly and critically educated mind) and requires a great deal of effort to understand why it works as it does. i'm glad to have you here, thipps, you seem to be a thinker.
muslima - thipps is right, you should read some books. the trouble is that you have to appreciate the perspective from which books are written. obviously sunni authors are likely to criticise shia and vice versa - they have genuine and important differences. you seem to think that simply reading the Qur'an will enable someone to know exactly what to do. this is, in my opinion, a mistake. the Qur'an is *really difficult* and requires expert help and interpretation, which leads one to a teacher. then, you take a risk on the right or wrong teacher. personally, i think that a teacher who gives you simple answers will be wrong in the long run. life is complex and the thought of Allah is even more complex. on that basis, it's incredibly important that you don't jump to conclusions about who is a "kafir" and who isn't. if you go to a simplistic teacher all he will tell you is that a kafir is someone who doesn't agree with him.
the important thing is that you are thinking, asking and discussing. don't just accept what people tell you just because they know more than you - every book, like every teacher, can be contradicted.
a book i can thoroughly recommend is karen armstrong's "a history of G!D", which should give you an idea about the development of ideas of G!D in judaism, christianity and islam. alternatively, i also suggest "the battle for G!D", which is a history of fundamentalism, showing how some jews, christians and muslims through history have become intolerant of others and of modernity.
feel free to ask more questions, though. i'm not a muslim, but i do consider myself very pro-islam and may be able to help. however, please try to write in full sentences - a web forum is not for text messages.
b'shalom/was-salaam
bananabrain