Save Our Souls
- Reaction score
- Worcester UK
Arius reasoned that the Son was begotten before time began, and was responsible, with the Father, for creating time.
..but what does that mean?
Does that mean that Arius believed that the Son was eternal, or not?
It would be more logical to accept the evidence letters of Arius himself, than to reason that a Bishop rejected the Gospel of John 1700 years ago because you logically deduce it?
I know that you'd LIKE those letters to be true .. you've made that abundantly clear
There was no time before time. Spirit is not subject to time.
Oh .. so Arius believed that the Son was eternal then .. is that what you are saying?