davidsheep88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 390
- Reaction score
- 79
- Points
- 28
Yup thank G-d Jesus is king of kings highest status ever ! -_-.
I believe Christ manifest as Jesus is the eternal bridge between God and carbon-based man. He is Emmanuel -- God with us -- Wonderful Counsellor. Christ gives us God as man, because god is also the god of a neutron star, and of fish, of birds and cattle and of whirling galaxies.Yup thank G-d Jesus is king of kings highest status ever ! -_-.
I don't remember reciting this creed in the choir-stalls.I believe there is life all around us all the time, often more advanced than man, but which we cannot directly see, unless such higher beings choose to reveal themselves to our carbon based senses. I believe many other worlds are inhabited, even in our own solar system, but by life we cannot recognize. I believe most other worlds, like our own, are themselves living entities.
Yes, IMO for us human beings in this world of nature -- of fathers and mothers, and birth and death, and time and space -- God indeed manifests as Father -- the One God who is everlasting -- and Christ in Jesus indeed as our wonderful counsellor and saviour, Emmanuel, God with us. Because that is how the divine is understood by man -- the God of whirling galaxies, yet 'closer than my jugular vein' and open to my own humble prayers.Our Father, is the One God, who is everlasting.
Your final point may or may not be correct, but the verse you chose does not make the point. The translation is off. It does not talk about G-d’s truth. It talks about G-d’s faith.4 For the Lord is gracious, his mercy is everlasting :
and his truth endureth from generation to generation.
- Psalms of David 100 -
Notice the bit I have bolded .. God was the same "truth" 5000 years ago.
As a check against self-delusion. How can you preserve against subjective error when the subject is given absolute priority? What makes you think you have a Greater Self?Validate it in what way and why?
It would be if you were not in fact free, but only thought you were.I don't see how being free from another's Will would be an illusion.
Hang on ... you quoted a text, I asked to see the citation. I read the text (what we have of it), and couldn't find it (although I might have missed it). I was just wondering whether you're citing what the text says, or what someone says the text says?"The Testimony even claims that...
If you got a better God?As you understand God....
I think you're being pedanticYour final point may or may not be correct, but the verse you chose does not make the point. The translation is off. It does not talk about G-d’s truth. It talks about G-d’s faith.
Well as something of an artist, I can say 'OK', but I don't regard that Greater Self as anything more than the Self, really.We know our Greater Self eveytime we Create something, specifically a work of Art. We can find our Greater Self with each act that elevates us above our mundane lesser self.
I'd have to say the LHP seems to be.Most religions are based on faith.
No. You posted:Didn't I explain where the text comes from and its relativeness?
Ah, well.Looks like two trees to me.
Nah, not according to the text. He was more than a beast, and his obedience was according to the nature of things.The Serpent made man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience;
Nonsense. Prior to taking his advice, man walked and talked with God.the Serpent emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity
Well he had the power to think before the serpent made his appearance, and therefore had the power to rebel, which is a choice, not a power. He had the free will to rebel, again, before the serpent.was endowed to a higher degree than the animals of any other species with two precious faculties — the power to think and the desire to rebel.
Bingo, imoYou can't have God on your terms, so you deny God's existence, and made a way of it ... that's all.
Well as something of an artist, I can say 'OK', but I don't regard that Greater Self as anything more than the Self, really.
A while ago I found a text, read it, and was blown away. I then discovered that I wrote it! At the time I was deeply into certain writers, the Traditionalists. If I read a text, I'd know pretty quickly whether it was a trad author or not. I could believe I was channelling them ... but the more likely explanation is I had shaped my process according to theirs.
I know many writers who say they start from not-knowing, and their characters come alive on the page ... I don't see how creativity implies a greater self.
I'd have to say the LHP seems to be.
No. You posted:
‑from the Gospels of Nag Hammadi: Testimonial of Truth:
"the God whom most Christians worship, the God of the Hebrew Bible, is 'himself' one of the fallen angels, from whose tyranny Christ came to set human beings free."
I can't see that in the Testimony of Truth I'm looking at.
What text?Nah, not according to the text. He was more than a beast, and his obedience was according to the nature of things.
Nonsense. Prior to taking his advice, man walked and talked with God
Well he had the power to think before the serpent made his appearance, and therefore had the power to rebel, which is a choice, not a power. He had the free will to rebel, again, before the serpent.
I keep posting objections, you ignore them, because you have no argument.
Reply removed at user's own requestYou can't have God on your terms, so you deny God's existence, and made a way of it ... that's all.
As I say, I just think it's the nature of the creative process. I don't need a 'greater self' ...Where do you think your 'channeling' came from? True Creation is a divine process, that process comes through us via our Greater Self.
Ah, thanks, I understand now.My mistake, this was taken from Dr. Elaine Pagels' book "The Origin of Satan".
Scripture.What text?
I'm not as against that as you might suppose ... and I suppose, for brevity's sake, I'd say yes they are structures, but there is nevertheless an underlying reality, and the dissonance between what I see Christianity (for example) to mean and be, and what so often pops up here as 'Christians say ... ' or 'the Christian view...' which is so often utterly negative, is a failure on the part of Christians to get beneath the skin of the thing, and a vocal element to misguide so many, as much as a critique of those who assume to understand it from quite a superficial exposure (not having a pop at you here, btw!).Yes, I deny all gods, devils, angels, and demons' existence, they are simply archetypal structures, nothing more.
It’s just so simple .....and I doubt whether you believe that there is more than one G-d.
If you do, that is not monotheistic, imo.
Your statement here rather proves the opposite. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, but man has had the freedom to choose whether or not to take part from the beginning. The fact that Adam and Eve were, to spite prior warning, still able to be influenced by Satan, proves we've always had freewill. They knew what God said, they knew what Satan said, A choice was made and that same choice exists for us today.That may be true but, man was under the Will of God, not Free from His Will, the Serpent did indeed emancipate man from God's Will.
Absolutely right. We choose what spiritual path to follow.The fact that Adam and Eve were, to spite prior warning, still able to be influenced by Satan, proves we've always had freewill. They knew what God said, they knew what Satan said, A choice was made and that same choice exists for us today.
Reply removed at user's own requestYour statement here rather proves the opposite. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, but man has had the freedom to choose whether or not to take part from the beginning. The fact that Adam and Eve were, to spite prior warning, still able to be influenced by Satan, proves we've always had freewill. They knew what God said, they knew what Satan said, A choice was made and that same choice exists for us today.