What are you looking for?... although I have no idea what that is. I have no clue what most of the checklist means.
Well, I think you'll find that neither one will respond to machismo ...Haven't heard from them in awhile, so perhaps it's time for them to girl up? I stand in doubt that they are able to do so. Perhaps it is time for them to meet their master? *have woken up insane*
What are you looking for?
Well, I think you'll find that neither one will respond to machismo ...
Seattlegal would slap you with a fish. Vajra / Jaye would probably politely bow and walk away.Love, I think?
Oh, I don't know, they might be challenged by it. (It might be something new for them.) I was just presenting myself as a target if they needed one. It never was about winning.
Seattlegal would slap you with a fish. Vajra / Jaye would probably politely bow and walk away.
It was a bad plan, poorly executed.
I like the idea...but we would almost have to pay a mod to police it.
1 on 1, IDK....now if we could design some sort of fishbowl consensus methodology...
We have to get it back, imo?Have at it if that is what you want. I think what little is left of polite conversation around here will die an ignoble death if you go forward with this idea.
BingoI would like to see more traffic, more people...but. More people interested in exploring, more people seeking to understand.
False Attribution Fallacy...and wishful thinking. It wouldn't stop a thing.[EDITED to be less emotional]
Because interpersonal abuse and logical fallacies would be barred, meanness and intellectual dishonesty would be barred.
Incomplete Comparison Fallacy, from someone with over 7000 posts interacting with others over 17 plus years on this specific forum. Which, by extension, means I've dealt with folks similar to yourself on more than one occasion around here. Only this time I am no longer constrained by decorum.To quiver at the prospect of this interchange of ideas happening is strange to me.
We have to get it back, imo?