Our spiritual receptivity capacity in the present moment is not unlimited;
Actually, I fear you have been deceived. If that's what your authorities have told you, they have led you astray.
The very nature of 'revelation' in this religious sense means knowledge of that which cannot be arrived at with any certainty by the unaided human intellect. It passes beyond the realm of intellectual forms. Hence it is always a 'mystery'.
This does not refer to science as yet undiscovered, or events that have not yet happened. That's not Religious Revelation.
In the religious context it means a self-disclosure by the Divine. A sense of the Absolute and the Infinite made known in the contingent and finite.
A sense of Oneness, Infinitude, Plenitude.
Revelation means that
sacra doctrina written millennia ago are still relevant because they speak of the eternal.
Revelation that has a time-stamp.
Sacra Doctrina underpins a flawless metaphysic that is consistently relevant because it is timeless and universal. It speaks about the fundamental "I and Thou" that transcends the worlds of forms.
It comes as no surprise to me there's no mention of Hermeticism, no mention of Gnosticism.
“I am as sure as I live that nothing is so near to me as God. God is nearer to me than I am to myself; my existence depends on the nearness and the presence of God.” ― Meister Eckhart
"You were more inward to me than my most inward part,” or “you were closer to me than I am to myself.” (T
u autem eras interior intimo meo.)
Augustine of Hippo.
"And We have already created man and know what his soul whispers to him, and We are closer1 to him than [his] jugular vein." (Qran, Surah Qaf 16)
Such would appear inadmissible in Urantia because it does not allow a direct and unmediated union with the Divine.
The book says:
91:7.1 [Part III]
Mysticism, as the technique of the cultivation of the consciousness of the presence of God, is altogether praiseworthy, but when such practices lead to ...
What starts out as a supposed definition of the mystic devolves into straw-man fallacy.
What is spiritual practice, prayer and self-discipline if not "the technique of the cultivation of the consciousness of the presence of God"? It's not 'praiseworthy', it's 'the one thing necessary', the discernment between the real and the illusory.
101:1.2 [Part III]
The Thought Adjuster has no special mechanism through which to gain self-expression;
there is no mystic religious faculty for the reception or expression of religious emotions. These experiences are made available through the naturally ordained mechanism of mortal mind. And therein lies one explanation of the Adjuster's difficulty in engaging in direct communication with the material mind of its constant indwelling."
Emphasis mine. The alarms are sounding ... if you can't see the inherent danger here ...