Faithfulservant
Well-Known Member
I don't want to derail this thread further.
Reply removed at user's own requestWell, without plants, even if we somehow managed to produce the veggie food we need to live, we would die. To put it in brief:
Oxygen is a critical component of the Earth's atmosphere and is necessary for the survival of most living organisms. Plants are the primary producers of oxygen through the process of photosynthesis, and without them, the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere would decrease dramatically. This would lead to the death of most animals, including humans, as they would not be able to breathe.
If you reread my message, you can see that I specifically wasn't talking about plants as saviors by being our food but rather as modifiers of our breathable air. You seem intent on absolutes. Yes, many lifeforms dont need oxygen to survive. But many do as well. And in the interconnectedness of all that is being, death of one implies the death of the other.An enormous amount of life on this planet exists without vegetation as their food source, so you are wrong, not every organism requires oxygen either.
No, not the flood any more. "End of times". Apocalypse.Proud are ya? Or ready to start another flood?
As yet, there is no evidence for that... and personally I am waiting for my death so that I may experience the afterlife, if indeed there is one.
LOL! There would be no life if an asteroid hit our planet either. No four-legged creatures or winged creatures would be able to stop it from destroying this tiny rock you call home. Humans have the ability to do so with their ingenuity, however.“Before I was six years old, my grandparents and my mother had taught me that if all the green things that grow were taken from the earth, there could be no life. If all the four-legged creatures were taken from the earth, there could be no life. If all the winged creatures were taken from the earth, there could be no life. If all our relatives who crawl and swim and live within the earth were taken away, there could be no life. But if all the human beings were taken away, life on earth would flourish. That is how insignificant we are.”
Russell Means, Oglala Lakota Nation (November 10, 1939 – October 22, 2012).
I am a human, supposedly, and decades into participating in the destruction of the planet as we know it, I have bought plastic, had offspring, flown in jets and mowed lawns, totally a participant
I do, but have gotten lazy and now have someone else peel n prep the eggplant!
But yes, watching ants in the line for food impresses me, long posts of regurgitated pablum not so much
Reply removed at user's own requestIf you reread my message, you can see that I specifically wasn't talking about plants as saviors by being our food but rather as modifiers of our breathable air. You seem intent on absolutes. Yes, many lifeforms dont need oxygen to survive. But many do as well. And in the interconnectedness of all that is being, death of one implies the death of the other.
Have you explored the states of nonduality or advaita? If you ever experience them or even understand the teachings behind them, you may see with different eyes. Your choice of course. My personal belief, based on some experiences, is that regardless of what we are in this life, when it ends we all return to our Godself. Unconditional love means, for me, love of all. Not just the beings who believe in you. In the end, I find that nothing really matters and we may choose to approach life with either a nihilistic or absurdist point of view. Regardless, all humans will die and personally I am waiting for my death so that I may experience the afterlife, if indeed there is one.
Who is this person?I was taught our brother the theist scientist of the occult machines lied.
Which metals are these?Metals that only the deep state space pressures owned.
Can you expand on this deep state?Our warning the human mind of the deep state.
Do you mean this planet Earth? How do you know this?Upon the rock exactly where the position is in creation. Nowhere else.
Science investigates how the universe works. It proposes theories that make predictions and that are open to be disproved -- but in the meantime the theories work in practice -- your internet device, for example.Once science was said to be special by men who said scientists were special as just humans.
Do you have evidence that archaeologists found this stuff in coal?They killed burnt all life to death on earth by AI machines. Archaeologists said I'll dig up the evidence. Found the machine parts and jewellery in coal and instant snap fused again.
OkAI he says is special and now wants all humanity to join AI turning their back on mother nature's warnings.
That we can answer. 13.78 billion years.In genesis 2' 4; the 6 creative days are referred to as the six generations of the universe, how old do you think this generation of the universe is.
That would be today's answer for the length of this generation of this universe...but it will change as science does....and does not answer the question from which it linkedThat we can answer. 13.78 billion years.
Humans are on rock.Who is this person?
Which metals are these?
Can you expand on this deep state?
Do you mean this planet Earth? How do you know this?
Science investigates how the universe works. It proposes theories that make predictions and that are open to be disproved -- but in the meantime the theories work in practice -- your internet device, for example.
Do you have evidence that archaeologists found this stuff in coal?
Ok
That it will change is your presumption. At the moment, there is no evidence that it is likely to change.That would be today's answer for the length of this generation of this universe...but it will change as science does....and does not answer the question from which it linked
Do you mean this?I don't remember the author of. Very thick book of archaeological evidences. The found in coal artefact on the internet.
Lol, wrong. Your date is plus or minus 20 million years, that date is also a prediction based on a plethora of past assumptions. It will be refined or changed as time goes on just as it has since man said 6.days.That it will change is your presumption. At the moment, there is no evidence that it is likely to change.
As for the question from which it is linked - there is no evidence of six generations of universe.
+/- 20 million does not change much in 13.78 billion years - 0.145%Lol, wrong. Your date is plus or minus 20 million years, that date is also a prediction based on a plethora of past assumptions. It will be refined or changed as time goes on just as it has since man said 6.days.
And we don't even know if this is the first universe, your positivity of the date is like any religious certainty....a belief
The evidence that it will change is the fact that it changes with new info regularly and everytime folks had that theist level positivity that they knew what they were talking about.+/- 20 million does not change much in 13.78 billion years - 0.145%
That is what I said. No evidence that we belong to the sixth generation of the universe.
But if all the bears were taken away, or all the deer, or all the frogs, or all the turtles, or all the gophers, or all the giraffes, or all the armadillos, or if all the bison were taken away, life on earth would still flourish. So would humanity. That is how insignificant four legged creatures are."... if all the green things that grow were taken from the earth, there could be no life. If all the four-legged creatures were taken from the earth, there could be no life. If all the winged creatures were taken from the earth, there could be no life. If all our relatives who crawl and swim and live within the earth were taken away, there could be no life. But if all the human beings were taken away, life on earth would flourish. That is how insignificant we are.”