Enemies of Reason P1

Naturalist said:
Then why did you do it? Are you schizophrenic?
Click to expand...
Why you you do it to assert the chsnce of intelligent design is unlikely to the point of impossibility?

Anyway, look I'm done with the brick wall
 
RJM said:
Why fo you do it to assert the possibility of intelligent design is unlikely to the point of impossibility

Anyway, look I'm done with the brick wall
Click to expand...
I didn't say impossibility....why do you continue to commit the straw man fallacy?

Have you hit your head on a brick wall?
 
RJM said:
Sigma 99.9 unlikely
Whatever
Click to expand...
Intelligent design:

1. Basically the god of the gaps fallacy. You know this, but you intentionally commit the fallacy over and over. Why can't you help yourself?

2. How do you get intelligence without a nervous system? Nervous systems developed long after the start of the Universe.

3. How does the Designer manufacture the design?

4. Who designed the Designer? How was that done? And who designed that designer?

5. Why is the product so poorly efficient?
 
Naturalist said:
How do you get intelligence without a nervous system?
Click to expand...
Here is the fallacy. There's no meeting point. To me the Earth is intelligent. The universe is intelligent. Brick wall
 
RJM said:
Here is the fallacy. There's no meeting point. To me the Earth is intelligent. The universe is intelligent. Brick wall
Click to expand...
That's another fallacy. If you can't prevent yourself from committing logical fallacies, then I can't have a logical dialogue with you.

The brick wall is you.
 
Naturalist said:
That's another fallacy. If you can't prevent yourself from committing logical fallacies, then I can't have a logical dialogue with you.

The brick wall is you.
Click to expand...
Yawn ...
 
Naturalist said:
And so it goes.....when you have the mental discipline to control your irrationality, let me know.
Click to expand...
When you lose your vast mental superiority and open to dialogue, let me know
 
RJM said:
When you lose your vast mental superiority and open to dialogue, let me know
Click to expand...
I am always open to dialogue with rational people. Rational people do have better critical thinking skills than irrational people.

Just like athletes have better physical traits than non-athletes.

Nothing insulting...just the facts of life.
 
Naturalist said:
I am always open to dialogue with rational people. Rational people do have better critical thinking skills than irrational people.

Just like athletes have better physical traits than non-athletes.

Nothing insulting...just the facts of life.
Click to expand...
And there are a vast range of people that quite outlie your limited bubble of what is and what is not
 
RJM said:
And there are a vast range of people that quite outlie your limited bubble of what is and what is not
Click to expand...
False assertion.

But you did avoid answering my #27 comment. So it's clear I outlie your limited bubble.
 
Naturalist said:
False assertion.

But you did avoid answering my #27 comment. So it's clear I outlie your limited bubble.
Click to expand...
They're shallow and not worthy of response. The universe isn't the deterministic and rational organism you limit it to be. I'm done with responding to your trolling ...
 
RJM said:
They're shallow and not worthy of response. The universe isn't the deterministic and rational organism you limit it to be. I'm done with responding to your trolling ...
Click to expand...
Okay, so by fiat you criticize the questions I gave IN RESPONSE to one of YOUR previous comments.

I responded to your shallow comment...how convenient that you find you can't respond to mine.

You are an intellectual coward.
 
Naturalist said:
Basically the god of the gaps fallacy. You know this, but you intentionally commit the fallacy over and over. Why can't you help yourself?
Click to expand...
No. My experience of God is personal and real and independent of rational analyses by superior intellectual reasoning
Naturalist said:
How do you get intelligence without a nervous system? Nervous systems developed long after the start of the Universe.
Click to expand...
Consciousness is not a product of matter
Naturalist said:
How does the Designer manufacture the design?
Click to expand...
How did the universe decide to form instead of not to form
Naturalist said:
Who designed the Designer? How was that done? And who designed that designer?
Click to expand...
Who knows
Naturalist said:
Why is the product so poorly efficient?
Click to expand...
In what way does the universe not meet your standards?

Listen -- this is OLD HAT. It's BORING and it's been done here and everywhere else ten thousand times over.

You're trolling IMO and a waste of time and words and that's the end of what you get of mine
 
Naturalist said:
It is unreasonable because no one can describe it ...
Click to expand...
But they have.

Naturalist said:
... no one can provide a reasonable analogy,
Click to expand...
But they have.

Naturalist said:
no one can describe how it accomplished whatever is claimed to have been accomplished.
Click to expand...
But they have.

Do I have to make a list of scientists, philosophers, etc., who are highly regarded by their peers, who profess a religious belief? Are you saying they're all deluded?

Naturalist said:
Regarding last comment and a priori .....I'm flabbergasted. My answer is "we don't know". Your answer is "God did it". You have arrived at an answer in your favor. NOT ME.
Click to expand...
OK, but that does not mean my answer is 'wrong', or your response is 'right', it's just a measure of credulity.
 
RJM said:
No. My experience of God is personal and real and independent of rational analyses by superior intellectual reasoning
Consciousness is not a product of matter
How did the universe decide to form instead of not to form
Who knows In what way does the universe not meet your standards?

Listen -- this is OLD HAT. It's BORING and it's been done here and everywhere else ten thousand times over.

You're trolling IMO and a waste of time and words and that's the end of what you get of mine
Click to expand...
Your answers are either fallacious...the fallacy of personal experience for example.
Or you provide questions for answers, so you can avoid an answer (intellectual cowardice).
Or you are simply wrong.

See my comment #31.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top