Well, no-on does that!I agree. But drinking (human) blood and eating (human) flesh is a bit too much.
Well, no-on does that!I agree. But drinking (human) blood and eating (human) flesh is a bit too much.
I believe that nonsense was built up by the young church. Although the gospels do include Jesus in that primitive tradition I believe that this was written in to his story 'after the fact'.I agree. But drinking (human) blood and eating (human) flesh is a bit too much.
That's a personal conviction, I'm assuming?I believe that this was written in to his story 'after the fact'.
Study of the gospels over time leading to such decisions.That's a personal conviction, I'm assuming?
Did anything specifically lead you there?
I have no theory as to whether they were lying, exaggerating, gossiping, or anything else.When your enemies criticise you, this doesn't automatically mean that they are lying, you know.
Well theories of the Eucharist make it seem as if they do on some levelWell, no-on does that!
Fair enough!I have no theory as to whether they were lying, exaggerating, gossiping, or anything else.
At some level, yes, but not at the corporeal level ... if we were eating His flesh, or drinking His blood, then that body would have been used up millennia ago!Well theories of the Eucharist make it seem as if they do on some level
Well but if it is miraculous...At some level, yes, but not at the corporeal level ... if we were eating His flesh, or drinking His blood, then that body would have been used up millennia ago!
I think it would be interesting. It may or may not be off topic given that it does refer to drinking wine, but perhaps it needs a new thread.LOL ... again, the Eucharist is way off topic here ... If you wanna discuss, we can go ahead ...
Done, a shortened version of a much longer pieceI think it would be interesting. It may or may not be off topic given that it does refer to drinking wine, but perhaps it needs a new thread.