TheLightWithin
...through a glass, darkly
- Messages
- 1,928
- Reaction score
- 1,105
- Points
- 108
Ironic statement?You come across as quite arrogant and judgy and to try and judge somebody who you barely know seems pretty dumb
Ironic statement?You come across as quite arrogant and judgy and to try and judge somebody who you barely know seems pretty dumb
are you serious?Not much of an attack to mention doubt on someone's brain capacity
Wisdom comes from how we use our knowledge - we have to do something.I love truth seeking and knowledge and the little taste I got from what I believe to be God was so overwhelming and such a small piece of it that I would never want to understand it and would probably die and have to reset if I did
It'll only feel like an attack if you are not confident in your own capacityare you serious?
You* I have different needsWisdom comes from how we use our knowledge - we have to do something.
what do you mean by thatIt'll only feel like an attack if you are not confident in your own capacity
what do you mean by thatYou* I have different needs
..he's no longer with us, so don't expect a reply.what do you mean by that
Yeah I saw that in the thread that contained the last straw...he's no longer with us, so don't expect a reply.
As you know I'm often accused of being a literalist. Yet most of these "contradictions" are not even close to being contradictions. For example, the different family trees for Jesus. I'm certain you know of that one. So when literalists point out contradictions, I always wonder why they don't just do a simple search of these contradictions and find the obvious answers.And yet, had you bothered to look a little deeper, the contradictions are resolved.
In my experience it's usually the literalist who bangs on about contradictions, who read without insight or understanding, and speak about things they clearly have no real understanding of.
Comments like this do no no credit at all ...
So sad. It's amazing how someone can boldly claim they are closer to Jesus than anyone, yet inexplicable run around in circles of logic all day. This guy would make a terrible apostle, but a great press secretary!Yeah I saw that in the thread that contained the last straw.
So why don't you think that the creator chose evolution to do the job?,It's not an Evolution that made the Beautiful Peacock to be what it is .
Oh, I don't know, it is after all the basis of the trial by jury system.and to try and judge somebody who you barely know seems pretty dumb
I think there's a different thread here where people try to argue against evolution.Imagine saying the Numerous Different Types of Fish in the Ocean is as a result of some Biological Changes somewhere .No.
2. and 3. may not be wrong, but 1. certainly is not all right. There are moments in life when we have a legitimate, non-sick, need to summon up support when and where it seems absent or lean. A view of the deep zone (or other areas) of hidden resources is sometimes aided by personification.No. There is no possibility of any God/Gods/Goddesses to exist. They are products of human imagination. Those who said that he/they exist were either 1. psychologically disturbed, 2. wanted to be leaders among their people, were seeking power, or 3. were plain charlatns/scammers who did that for their own benefit.
That is a very bold statement. It is one that even Richard Dawkins does not accept. I hope you can back this up.No. There is no possibility of any God/Gods/Goddesses to exist. They are products of human imagination.
He's working on it. I challenged his statement multiple times. He recently told me that he is working on his research. So let us be patient with him.That is a very bold statement. It is one that even Richard Dawkins does not accept. I hope you can back this up.
Seems like it falls under the banner of a False Dilemma FallacyHe's working on it. I challenged his statement multiple times. He recently told me that he is working on his research. So let us be patient with him.