LOL . . . make meHere we go again. Whenever I call out your hypocrisy or your empty claims you usually resort to insults, ignore me because you realize you're wrong, tell me to go away (for the same reason) or in one instance you actually admitted error. But let's have a look at some of your statements, shall we?
Quote 1: "On the Western Left Hand Path, there is no external god, no creator of the universe (objective universe), science is proving this day by day. What is misunderstood as GOD is the mythos of a Supreme Being/Absolute/All but in reality this is each of our Greater Self/GodSelf/Psyche/Soul. Not One God but Many."
Prove your statement.
Quote 2:
God Doesn't Exist
If God exists, then God is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect.
If God is omnipotent, then God has the power to eliminate all evil.
If God is omniscient, then God knows when evil exists.
If God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil.
Evil exists.
If evil exists and God exists, then either God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil, or doesn’t know when evil exists or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil. Therefore . . .
God Doesn’t Exist
Once again, do explain. I have seen this logic before. It is quite the strawman and assumption, an assumption with no provided evidence. As Thomas stated, this is a False Dilemna Fallacy.
You explained it with the following:
"Whereas my example only touches on a couple of reasons why God is Impossible, it doesn't make it false."
The concept of 'god' fails in that:
1) There is no evidence of such a god
2) The idea is illogical
3) The preponderance of suffering remains
4) We don’t need an external god
5) Life is better without god
Prove the statements above.
Where have I used the word 'Saytan'?I thought that the different spelling "saytanist" had to do with an Islamic conception of Satan and a different group or approach.
But @'Amir Alzzalam could clarify?
What is 'demonic ritual'? LMFAO . . .Does he? @'Amir Alzzalam, do you indeed think something like that?
e.g. Opposites imply Duality, and Duality is an illusion of objective reality. Darkness isn't the antithesis of Light, nor is it the absence of Light. Instead, Darkness predates Light, serving as the nurturing space where Light takes form. Without Darkness, Light cannot exist; it is the foundation upon which Light unfolds. There is no Duality, there is only the illusion of Duality.Another empty claim of yours...
"There is Only Harmony between Polar Extremes"
Dead Sirius" One man's good will always be another man's evil."
Seriously?
Oh? And which aspect of this evidence fails logic?Another quote:
"There is evidence of the Greater Self"
You're a real glutton for punishment I see . . . very wellAnother quote: "Evolution clearly explains how nothing is 'perfect' and even more so that there is no need for a Creator"
I'm waiting for the evidence for that belief.
If you have proof they aren't then the world would like to know this proof and you would stand to become world famous and very wealthy . . . what are you waiting for?Another one...
"Demons are make-believe..."
There is no excuse for ignorance . . .I was under the impression that he was a LaVeyan Satanist. If that's not the case, then this is going to get even more interesting.
You've used it right on your name plate, it says "Saytanist" though there is a mark over the S and the 2nd a that I don't remember how to duplicateWhere have I used the word 'Saytan'?
Šayṭānist has no specific meaning other than Satanist, it would however refer to my work with Arabic Majiq (magic) <-- another of my spellingsYou've used it right on your name plate, it says "Saytanist" though there is a mark over the S and the 2nd a that I don't remember how to duplicate
Here we go I cut and pasted it from right under your name
Šayṭānist
I vaguely thought it might refer to something different than Satanist as such, though I found I had no luck finding anything but regular Satanist come up when I tried to google what Šayṭānist might be.
The observer effect is a longstanding quantum theory, based on seeing a pattern of quanta (discrete packets or globs of energy? Not sure if a quanta is objective or theoretical only. Photons are objective, as far as I know) acting like particles instead of waves when observed by humans or by human instruments. Suggests that someone believes that human consciousness affects subatomic units,"Quantum physicists discovered that physical atoms are made up of vortices of energy that are constantly spinning and vibrating. Matter, at its tiniest observable level, is energy, and >human consciousness is connected to it<, human consciousness can influence its behavior and even re-structure it."
...and your evidence that human consciousness influences its behavior?
Hm. I figured it was Satanist but I speculated that it was a denomination relevant to Islamic esotericism.Šayṭānist has no specific meaning other than Satanist, it would however refer to my work with Arabic Majiq (magic) <-- another of my spellings