Thoughts about Trinity beliefs

..perhaps you can tell me why I should want to live forever? .. if I have a choice, that is.
no idea.
if immortality is conditional, you wouldn't.
..conditional upon what? ..wouldn't what?
..conditional upon what? .
Upon G-d granting eternal life
..wouldn't what?
Wouldn't live forever (referencing your earlier comments)
 
CONDITIONAL IMMORTALITY







ENCLOSING THE AMAZON LINK BECAUSE THE DESCRIPTION IS SO RICH AND EXPLANATORY

ENCLOSING THE REDDIT LINK BECAUSE THE DISCUSSION IS GOOD

 
Upon G-d granting eternal life
..so I'm forced to live forever, if I believe in Jesus Christ?

What I'm trying to point out, is that the doctrine of conditional immortality assumes that
people would want to live forever.

Clearly many people do not .. the suicide rates are increasing.
Rich people often want to live forever .. I understand there are many film-stars of Hollywood
that have been frozen, hoping to be rejuvenated in a later century. ;)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

However, if a soul is immortal, there is no escape from our deeds .. good or bad.
That corresponds to present reality .. where eventually, bad deeds get caught up with.

..so philosophically, I don't see that the doctrine makes any sense .. there is only heaven
and no hell .. and we can apparently escape any consequence like Hitler, who topped himself.
 
Last edited:
..so I'm forced to live forever, if I believe in Jesus Christ?
It's not so much being forced as 'seeing the light' ;)
Clearly many people do not .. the suicide rates are increasing.
But that's mental instability, among other things – it's becoming subject to illusion, or subject to the archon of this world – death – in the view that death is the best solution all round.

Rich people often want to live forever .. I understand there are many film-stars of Hollywood
that have been frozen, hoping to be rejuvenated in a later century. ;)
Yerse ... and Jesus had something to say about that (riches, I mean).

However, if a soul is immortal, there is no escape from our deeds .. good or bad.
Quite right. There is a process of purification.

That corresponds to present reality .. where eventually, bad deeds get caught up with.
Yes and no ... our present reality still hankers after retribution. We require suffering as part of the process – we feel short-changed otherwise.

..so philosophically, I don't see that the doctrine makes any sense .. there is only heaven and no hell .. and we can apparently escape any consequence like Hitler, who topped himself.
But that's not the doctrine.

1: There is heaven and hell.
2: Hell is a temporary condition until the summation of the Age.
2a: It my well be that Heven is equally temporary, until the summation of the Age.
(In that Jesus returns, a New Jerusalem, and then the summation of the age.)
3: Hitler will not have escaped the consequences of his actions.
Therefore, we assume a lot of purification necessary, although we can also see that he was not in his right mind (being an addict, and off his rocker) and thus there are mitigating circumstances.

But whet we really face is not what God thinks is just, but what we think is just.

I think if something is so utterly corrupt that, after the purifying fire, there's actually no vestige of what once there was surviving the process, then it's non-existence.

If God is just, then perpetual punishment with no remittance, and no chance of change or repentance, is disproportionate and unjust.

Again, if no good comes out of it, I cannot see why God would will it, as God wills only the good?
 
But that's not the doctrine.
It is for the evangelicals.
Those who do not 'believe in Jesus' will cease to exist.

1: There is heaven and hell.
OK

If God is just..
We all know that G-d is Holy, perfect.

..then perpetual punishment with no remittance, and no chance of change or repentance, is disproportionate and unjust.
..but I don't see G-d as a person who sentences people to eternal punishment.
..or sentences people to eternal paradise, for that matter.

We reap what we sow .. it's all about the nature of a soul .. and the fact that it does not
disappear upon physical death.

Again, if no good comes out of it, I cannot see why God would will it, as God wills only the good?
Ummm .. G-d allows evil in this present life .. n'est pas? 😑
 
It is for the evangelicals.
Those who do not 'believe in Jesus' will cease to exist.
No, most evangelicals believe in eternal conscious torment in hell
More heterodox groups like SDAs, JWS, Christadelphians, and the descendants of the Armstrong churches, believe in conditional immortality, where the wages of sin = death.
 
..but I don't see G-d as a person who sentences people to eternal punishment.
..or sentences people to eternal paradise, for that matter.

We reap what we sow .. it's all about the nature of a soul .. and the fact that it does not
disappear upon physical death.
If you don't believe in eternal punishment, or eternal paradise, or conditional immortality, what IS your theory about what happens to a soul in the afterlife? 🤔
 
If you don't believe in eternal punishment, or eternal paradise, or conditional immortality, what IS your theory about what happens to a soul in the afterlife?
I have no theory..
..but I believe in life after physical death, and that people will not be wronged.
We will reap what we sow .. much like as in this life, with the caveat that our
deeds can no longer be hidden.
 
Only 16% of self-identified Christians in the United States believe in the Trinity, according to a 2025 study by the Cultural Research Center at Arizona Christian University.
 
Back
Top