Re: This week in [the orthodox] Cosmology
Do you have any opinions on the standard theories? I am fascinated by the anomalies in angular momentum and planetary position and am in the school of thought that thinks the outer planets are drifting farther from the sun.
Tao
Dear friend,
From the Wikipedia article one may read the following:
One problem with this hypothesis is that of
angular momentum. With the vast majority of the system's mass accumulating at the center of the rotating cloud, the hypothesis predicts that the vast majority of the system's angular momentum should accumulate there as well. However, the Sun's rotation is far slower than expected, and the planets, despite accounting for less than 1 percent of the system's mass, thus account for more than 90 percent of its angular momentum. (...)
or that
Planets in the "wrong place" are a problem for the solar nebula model.
Uranus and
Neptune exist in a region where their formation is highly implausible due to the reduced density of the solar nebula and the longer orbital times in their region. Furthermore (...)
or even that
The detailed features of the planets are yet another problem. The solar nebula hypothesis predicts that all planets will form exactly in the ecliptic plane. Instead, the orbits of the
classical planets have various (but admittedly small) inclinations with respect to the ecliptic. Furthermore (...)
Meaning: it is well known that current physical constantly patched theories in cosmology, based upon an incomplete (some would even say 'erroneous')
standard model and in the delusional four-dimensonal blending of space and time of the
theory of relativity (SR/GR), are having trouble to explain the basic mechanics of the solar system and the various current astronomical observations that seem to contradict the orthodox physics assumptions (be it, among other things, the wild imagination of an expanding universe or the popular idea of a big bang)... Yet, those pioneer men and women of Science who during last century made efforts to explore the
mystery underlying our physical universe were labeled "crackpots" and saw their careers, reputation and research ruined ... by a rotten dogmatic scientific community born from an ignorant modern society, proudly auto-proclaimed of knowledge, framed by a
reducist-materialist ideology: the "fundamaterialists" [to state the similarity of their assumptions in Science with that of the "fundamentalists" in Religion] (Grossman, 2002).
Those few who understand the limitations of current paradigm and look for a different and deeper perspective are regarded as the modern "heretics"; and you may get a brief idea of their achievements through their [
heretic] physics works like the following one (some technical understanding of algebraic equations and integral calculus, although not needed to grasp the basic concepts, is an advantage):
Creation: Stars and planets (PDF) &
The Angular Momentum of the Solar System (PDF) in
The Physics of Creation (2003) by Dr. Harold Aspden, an elderly Electrical engineer and Physicist (currently retired), Ph.D. from Trinity/Cambridge University [1953/4]
Hope this may be helpful unto your own research.
Best, Marco
« The theory is so rigidly held that young scientists dare not openly express their views.
I was warned that if I persisted (in refuting Einstein's theory) I was likely to spoil my career prospects.
The general public is misled into believing that science is a mysterious subject which can be understood by only a few exceptionally gifted mathematicians.
Students are told that the theory must be accepted although they cannot expect to understand it. They are encouraged right at the beginning of their careers to forsake science in favour of dogma.
...the continued acceptance and teaching of relativity hinders the development of a rational extension of electromagnetic theory. »
--
Louis Essen (1908-1997) in 'Relativity and Time Signals'
