Archimedes
Pagan Apostate
Which worshipped deity is older historically, Jesus or Krishna?
Hello Silverbackman,
Since you think religion would "do better united as one religion that way all the confusion on who is right and who is wrong [would] end", maybe having one language and one government would also "do better...that way all the confusion on who is right and who is wrong [would] end".
"There are 6,800 known languages spoken in the 200 countries of the world. 2,261 have writing systems (the others are only spoken) and about 300 are represented by on-line dictionaries as of May 11, 2004." Personally, I like the idea of having one language solely to communicate with people from around the world. The Internet is the perfect example. Who wants to try translating three or four different languages at the same time when you are chatting with people on messenger? Maybe you do, but not me!!!
I am not touching the one government issue tonight, maybe later with request.
In harmony,
Sassafras
Source for the number of languages in the world: yourDictionary.com
MS Security Essentials informs me that the linked file can harm my computer. But when Alexander was returning to Babylon via Sindh/Mekran (Pakistan), they came across bubbling mud wells which were known as 'Rama Kupa' (Rama's Wells). This was recorded by Greek historians (Diodorus) accompanying him. The wells still exist. That was 327 BC. (The ancient geography of India by Maj. General Alexander Cunningham, Surveyor General of Archeology, India, 1871, page 308)Krishna.. Pretty clear that personal worship of Krishna was in place by the 5th century BCE.
Google is available in 123 languages.The Internet is the perfect example.
One does not need to be a Hare-Krishna to answer this question.Are there no Hare Krishna's on the board to provide us answers to their beliefs on the above three questions? It seems we currently only have the opinions based on others beliefs on the questions...
Have they been able to unify all religions?Maybe you should drop by the Baha'i forum and get a second opinion by the Baha'is. You will be amazed at the answers
I like that, Aupmanyav. My bride (a practicing Native American Church type) has a simple answer "they were and are all jut one soul". I think that the Santhana Dharma does a better job "unifying all religions" than anyone, including Quakers and Bahais. Why? Are there atheist Bahais? Are there polytheist Quakers? (the first I am pretty certain is a no, the second, not unless neo-pagans are polytheists--not what they are known for).
I appreciate it. I really should have said "unifying all theologies" or "viewpoints". Allow the room (much like different Native American religions allow such wide and open diversity).
I happen to think there really is but one oversoul, and if one is in touch with it, one shares it. So you may think it a stretch, but in some manner "beyond" the souls of the great souled ones is shared.
Namaste Senthil... I think there are tens of thousands of Christian sects....how many hindu ones are there?? What are their big differences?....similarities...
Sanskrit is very old.Hinduism's diversity is more like the 3 Abrahamic religions combined. There are 4 main sects ... Smarta, Saiva, Shakta, and Vaishnava. Within Saivism there are 4 main schools, and within each school several smaller subsects. Within each of those there are Guru lineages. We have dual, non-dual, monism, and pluralism, inclusive monotheism, and even atheism. Scripture is vast in sruti (Vedas and Agamas) and smrti (written by men, Puranas,)
Besides there are some 20 languages of over 10 million speakers, and the liturgical Sanskrit. So yeah, it's complicated. A good comoilation of the basics is 'What is Hinduism' by Himalayan Academy. it's written by Hindus for Hindus, and doesn't have the western scholar bias in many introductory books.
As a Catholic, I agree absolutely.As a Hindu, I don't see it as a question of unifying, but more a question of getting along.
I would also add that dialogue between the 'institutional' traditions goes on out of the public gaze, and often on lot better terms than the dialogue occurs hereThere is a unity in diversity that comes about from respecting the right to differences.
So do I.I think it's quite the stretch to think Krishna and Christ are at all the same.
As a Catholic, I agree absolutely.
I would also add that dialogue between the 'institutional' traditions goes on out of the public gaze, and often on lot better terms than the dialogue occurs here
So do I.
I agree with that, but I don't necessarily think all faiths lead to it. In the classic and oft-quoted statement, 'one truth, many paths' it does not say that each path leads to this truth. Perhaps some don't make it to the top.
I agree with that, but I don't necessarily think all faiths lead to it. In the classic and oft-quoted statement, 'one truth, many paths' it does not say that each path leads to this truth. Perhaps some don't make it to the top.
I agree with your statement.Belief systems are simply cultural constructs. Different cultures apply the same symbols in different ways.
When people claim their religions are different, they are simply noting the cultural differences.
Astonishingly, your sky is the same as mine.
Nothing ashtonishing. Our sky may be the same but our religions are not. You have to worship your only jealous Gods (talking of monotheistic religions). All those who do not, suffer in hell for eternity. We have no such obligation. We can worship a thousand Gods or Goddesses, three, one, or none (with no deleterious consequences). Our Gods and Goddesses do not mind if others do not worship them.Astonishingly, your sky is the same as mine.