MagnetMan said:
It is understandable that at this moment of our evolution, while still in our rushing teens, sowing our wild oats and daring God with nuclear guns, that we might be a little cynical about our ultimate purposes. But if we accept the Divinity of our orgins, then we must too accept the Divinity of our destination -- from Big bang to Big Crunch. We have just entered a New Age of planet management. Many are already aware of the sober resposnibilities that lie ahead and the great challenges we have to meet.. After we have succeeded in our stewardship, an Age of Mastership will follow, when the God's-to-be will no longer be so flawed.
I fail to see the logic in determining that all humans are in a specific time frame of cosmic age, (e.g. teen age), and suspect that many elder humans might (most likely would), take issue with your notion that they are collectively of a teenage mindset.
However, if we were to follow your train of thought on the collective of mankind, then the North Americans, the Russians, and the Europeans figured out years ago that pulling "nuclear guns" out, for example was an exercise in futility. However, the Middle East and South East Asia have no such qualms, if they had them to pull. South America simply decided that nuclear development was financially unfeasable, and Africa and Australia could care less.
So, it seems we have a series of groups of humans in various stages of "development". And some seem to be more arrested than others.
Hate to say it, but apparently it is true, religion, the types of (or lack of), has a great deal to do with who is where, and why. Culture, also has a great deal to do with the status of certain groups of people.
Perhaps you are looking at the big picture. Granted it may look more or less grand, however anyone can throw a can of paint on a masterpiece, and there are those who would have no problem with doing just that.
What do you say about them? (Rhetorical question)
The original thought was human intelligence the result of alien intervention. We have been working with "primates" for nearly 100 years, intensely for the past 40 years, to get them to "speak" our language, and think like we do. That to the "chimpanzee" would be considered alien intervention. No?
We are a "god" to them (their own words), which thank "God" the handlers and scientists have insisted is not the case (to them). Give a Chimpanzee a cat, and what do you think happens? He becomes the care giver, a god (in his own mind) over the cat. If he is responsible for providing food for the cat, then to the cat the Chimp is like a god...
Many religions speak of "enlightened ones" coming from the sky (Christianity more or less included), and teaching us to be better. They become "God" to us. The pattern is there. We didn't come off the turnip truck yesterday (maybe it was the day before), but we have had help, and that help came from the outside. Man mimics what man experiences...
my thoughts
v/r
Q