Path of one, You are intitled to your "OPENIONS" but that does not negate the fact that there are children that are being born with more than one strand of DNA (not including the 'so called' junk DNA).
So-called "junk DNA" is interspersed with non-junk DNA. An extra strand of DNA is something like Trisomy 21, which is the cause of Down's Syndrome- three strands of the 21st chromosome. This is the type of results from genetic mutations of that size. In fact, it is one of the few mutations of that size that still produce living offspring.
I am not stating an opinion. I am stating biological fact. My point is that if someone makes scientific claims, they must back it up with
science. Science is a particular mode of inquiry. It is not individual opinions.
These children are gifted with outstanding abilities.
I've already read a lot of the literature on Indigo children. As I've indicated, it's not something particularly new. Shamans throughout history did this stuff.
As I have already stated, I know of many (one local) universities that have had panels of midical doctorss and Geneticists along with other groups that discussed the findings of these children.
Provide references, please. Until I have references such medical doctors and geneticists, this is just fluff. Anyone can say they know of anyone who has done anything. If it hasn't been published in scientific peer-reviewed journals, everyone in science knows it is not reliable.
Good Morning America did a segment on them three years ago. Its a topic fairly well known but it hasn't been studied long enough to make major publication.
Good Morning America is not a scientific resource. I know it is a well-known topic. People talking about something doesn't make it any more accurate. People the world over talk about dragons, but we haven't had scientific evidence of them yet, either.
It is not true to say that it hasn't been studied long enough. If the claim is that Indigo children were around since the 1970s, and people started talking about it in the 1980s- that is more than 25 years to today. That is plenty of time for someone to have published something if they actually have any data to report. It only takes a couple years from the end of a study to write an article and publish it. I know. I've done this myself, along with tons of my colleagues. Look at any other area of science and you'll see that this is the case. Any significant findings are published in a relatively short amount of time. If they are not published, they cannot yet claim that they have confirmed scientific evidence. Without valid citations/references, this information is in the realm of speculation, not science.
AS you know the Scientific field is very cautious and takes its time with its findings.
This is precisely why people shouldn't claim to be practicing science if they are making such non-supported claims as extra strands of DNA and feline hominoids. Either someone is practicing science or they aren't, and if they're not going to practice science as science is practiced, they should be honest about it.
The DNA isn't "EXTRA" it is merely portions of what has been labeled junk DNA that is active.
At the top of this very post, you state that the people have "extra strands of DNA." Having activated junk DNA is an entirely different matter. Clarity is important in genetics. I would still be somewhat skeptical of activated junk DNA until it is proven, but that is (at least) not as insupportable and non-viable as a mutation as would be extra chromosomes themselves. You must still realize that in human genetics, very minor mutations can carry very heavy (and costly) biological consequences. This is why there would be skepticism about nearly anything claiming substantial mutations that are producing viable offspring.
The same strands exist that carry the memory of the bodily structure, however there is more to the Human makeup than the body structure.
DNA carries more than the blueprint (not so much the memory) for the body. It also carries information about things such as personality, information processing, and mental illness. This is not new information.
What test are you talking about? There isn't a test to determain an Indigo other than a DNA test and an Indigo would never allow someone to take their DNA unless it is a child who's DNA is taken against its will.
There are personality and psychological tests abounding by all sorts of people who claim they are researching Indigos that people can use to "test" themselves and see if they are. I'm happy to provide links, if you like.
Secondly, if an Indigo will not submit to having a DNA test, then how to validate claims that they are genetically different from ordinary humans? Kind of a catch-22, yes? How did the people from your order come to this conclusion, if they didn't do DNA tests? And if they did do DNA tests, but Indigos won't submit willingly, then what are the ethical and human rights issues associated with this?
If I haven't provided you with an answer it is simply because I don't know the answser or overlooked the question.
Fair enough. These questions regarding the science might be better posed to whoever from your organization claims to be the scientists.
What do you mean by alian souls?
Souls that are reincarnated from planets other than earth. Some people believe they are reincarnated aliens. Some people who claim to do research on and with Indigos claim Indigos are reincarnated aliens. Your org is not the only one out there with a bunch of Indigos who came to some conclusion that is well, to be honest, pretty close to fantasy or science-fiction. This is partly my point- you are one Indigo in one organization that is in disagreement with other Indigos in other organizations. This inconsistency, along with a general lack of any published scientific evidence (though plenty of fluffy books, which also are inconsistent with each other) leads me to the logical conclusion that none of this is well-thought out, robust, proven by any sort of evidence, or even internally organized very well. It would boil down to: "No, I'm the Indigo! Our story is X! No, I'm the Indigo! Our story is Y!" That sort of thing. If all these Indigo children (including me, if you go by an awful lot of the well-published authors on the subject) have such specific and unified goals, come from the same places, and have the same memories... why are there so many differences?
Indigo's are not new to this planet they are very ancient to this planet, however in the past thirty years they started birthing in, in large numbers.
I just don't buy it. For one, it is a statement that can't be proven. To say "now they are birthing in large numbers" indicates a global demographic study that (1) hasn't happened yet and (2) never happened in the past. For all we know, people with characteristics termed presently Indigo existed in
greater numbers in the past, but at the time we didn't have the internet to talk to them, the drive for people to feel their child is something special, the absence of normal social roles for shamanic personality types, and so forth. This statement assumes a lot, but it is based on having no evidence whatsoever.
Please understand, I am not trying to degrade a belief system in any way. But I notice inconsistencies where they exist, and fantastic claims require fantastic evidence. What bothers me is not the belief, it is the claim to be grounded in science. If someone claims science as the root, science should be the root, with all its trappings of peer-review, published data, multiple confirmations, and systematic methodology.
What is you field of Science?
My doctorate is in cultural anthropology, with a specialty in cognitive and environmental anthropology. I was more broadly trained in my BA in biological anthropology, linguistics, and archaeology, and minored in religious studies.
Love and Light- back at ya!
Kim