Thanks for your response, cyberpi. I know it takes serious time and effort to address an issue like this. I appreciate your time and the tone of your posts. Somehow, even though you have identified yourself as that “frosty finger of condemnation”, I don’t see you that way. I may be missing something, but I just don’t feel that from you.
The poem does try to 'condemn' the 'sirs' per the gospel as if they were the scribe or Pharisees.
I don’t think it condemns the “Sirs” themselves, but perhaps their actions. I am not even sure that “condemn” is the correct term. More like “reject” or “refute”. Maybe even “ignore”. Or how about “look past”?
I think the poem expresses some inner pains and a hope for them to go away or to be taken away.
Yes, but for whom? If these verses were only for myself, then there would have been no need for them to be written or posted. The writer is not expressing a desire for the addressees to go away, only finally accepting their condemnation and moving on.
I don't really know who the author or the 'sirs' is supposed to be... I realize that you wrote it, but you also call it a poem and it reads like a nameless letter or the hint of something inspired. I read it from every angle, as if anyone were the author or the 'sirs', including Jesus or God. From every angle I see the author's pain and hope clearly
.
I don’t really know how to answer the question regarding authorship. I wrote it down, so for practical purposes, I suppose it is me. I know that some of me is in there. Sorry—that is the best way I know how to explain it.
The “Sirs” are not Jesus or God. The “Sirs” are those people and ideas who condemn others according to their own interpretations of Scripture, thereby closing the door on the hope that Christ represents.
The whole thing is backwards. I will explain why line by line, example, gospel, any method that anyone will listen... or if nobody is interested, then I won't.
If after reading my response here, you still are compelled to do so, then I will certainly listen as openly as I am able. What I don’t think would be wise would be to turn the discussion into one where we throw bits and pieces of Scripture at one another like flaming torpedoes. That is the kind of action the poem addresses, and it usually proves to be a vicious cycle.
…I really, really did not want to go near from any angle.
Yet it disturbed you so that you kept coming back to it. I have to wonder why. Maybe there is an element of misunderstanding here as well as an element of truth?
I love how it was expressed. I suggest the individual beliefs within it are not new to the world... they are everpresent. I have seen it expressed time and again now by people in many different ways, and I've come to see it where it misses its hope and lands back in it's own pain. I have backslided and landed in the same darkness expressed by the letter. There are some key concepts that I don't think any amount of personally shared words can show... well they can but a person doesn't learn by just reading them. For some things a person has to just do them for the right reasons, and then things are revealed to them within their own minds in their own way. I can see how expressing this letter would be a step towards that altar... expressing it may be an act of Faith for you. If so it is surely not overlooked from above. I suggest that whatever you benefit from it really came from God within your own mind... and will not be from anyone's words. If I have any true understanding it came from the same place.
After I read the words that were written, I also realized how many people have expressed these thoughts. Some have been burned alive for doing so. I am thankful that I live where this is not a concern for me, at least not yet. But it is for many people in the world, even today. Cyberpi, I don’t see how the words land in pain. They don’t for me. They lead me back to the treasure that is the promise and hope of the Christ. I concur that there are some concepts or revelations that are difficult to put into language, and that’s why I can only go so far with words. Yes, I can truthfully tell you that expressing these thoughts
in public was an act of faith for me.
I notice that your action, the words in the letter, and your follow up to my words were contradictory... have you noticed that? Also your ears perked up and that is a very good sign for you, also contradictory to the expressed beliefs in the letter.
I’m not sure what you mean by “contradictory”. If you mean responding to people who responded to the poem, what would you have me do? As I have said, I did not know what would happen with the OP. Maybe that is not what you mean. My ears perked up because I wanted to understand your comments, and because so much of what you said sounded a lot like how I felt when I read what I’d written. It sounded so close, yet so different.
If I sound confusing, it may be that there are just some things about the words I don’t want to interpret for someone else, if that makes any sense at all. I think the words speak pretty much for themselves. But in this case, I thought there might be a real misunderstanding of the intent behind them, and I want to clear that much up if I can. If not, then they stand for what they are. And certainly, if you understand something about them that I don’t see, then continue to help me see it, if you like. We may not ultimately see things the same way, but understanding one another is a good thing. It can be painful at times, but I think it is worth it.
InPeace,
InLove