It is a fact often overlooked that the Christ who rose from the tomb is not visibly the same as the Christ who was placed therein, by which I mean the Crucified Christ had been abused, beaten, whipped, crowned with thorns, nailed to a cross, and speared in the side ... in short, the body that went into the tomb was a wreck.
It is highly unlikely, therefore, that had there been no substantial change, that His closest followers would not have recognised Him.
But by all accounts the post-resurrection appearances were not of a broken and bloodied ruin of a man.
So we know that Jesus Christ was, in some fashion, reconstituted ... but we also know that He still bore certain signs, holes in His hands and feet, the wound in His side ...
... something to contemplate ...
Thomas
It is highly unlikely, therefore, that had there been no substantial change, that His closest followers would not have recognised Him.
But by all accounts the post-resurrection appearances were not of a broken and bloodied ruin of a man.
So we know that Jesus Christ was, in some fashion, reconstituted ... but we also know that He still bore certain signs, holes in His hands and feet, the wound in His side ...
... something to contemplate ...
Thomas