Muslimwoman
Coexistence insha'Allah
Egypt and Ethiopia are a test case, one with Islam one without, but sharing a lot of cultural heritage-- same outcomes; conclusion, Islam isn't the factor, culture is.
Hi Bob
I did a whole thread about female circumcision (I think in the lounge of all places) but it had some links to very informative articles. I agree the practice probably began in Africa (think I said that in an earlier post on this thread) but I am pleased you can accept now it is a cultural practice. However, that does not excuse the Muslim scholars that support it and say it is an Islamic practice.
On "affairs", those can also start because a wife wants escape from a jealously possessive husband who threatens to beat up any man who tries to be friendly to her: this I have seen.
I accept that affairs can start for a million reasons, it is a human weakness. Yes a controlling husband could lead to a wife wanting to have an affair. In Egypt they tend not to happen, not because the people are so pious but because they are terrified of what the neighbours might say. Other than men living on one contintent and women on another, you cannot eradicate adultery. All I was trying to say was that by not taking that first small step, it can stop you from taking a big one. Well, it works for me.
Even if it "works" in that sense, I would still say the trade-off is sad, indeed downright unGodly-- but, as you are now doubt thinking right now, who asked my opinion?
I sometimes find it sad too, because of the extent it is taken to. I love my father in law, yet I am not allowed to hug him. Sometimes I rebel and kiss him on the cheek, he goes completely rigid and doesn't know where to look. Yet when we walk in the street together he always makes me hold his arm (the idea being this is for my safety so I do not fall but we both know he just enjoys human contact).
If I am truthful with you I think the perfect lifestyle would be somewhere in the middle of our cultures (western and Muslim). One is too free and one is too rigid - nowhere is perfect.
when I find you unclear and mistake your meaning, you get snappish and accuse me of intentionally and maliciously misunderstanding;
You really can't expect to say such things as 'lump in a bag' and not get a snippy reaction. I love posting on CR but the last couple of weeks I appear to have been bashed from all sides (Muslim and non Muslim) but that is no excuse for being snippy with strangers, so I apolgise for my snippyness.
But maybe you are just using the word "respect" in a weaker sense: that you would not *interfere* with my choice to live as I do, regardless of your low opinion of that.
Acceptance of choice is perhaps the right terminology.
(with some exceptions where facial visibility is crucial, as in driver's license and other ID photos, and on the witness stand, to cite two recent controversial cases).
For identification purposes I agree with you completely, what is the point of a passport with a photo of a piece of black cloth? As long as women that wear the veil are allowed to request a female to check their physical identity against their documents. As for the witness stand, I think a compromise is called for. The court should be cleared of all non essential personnel (including clerks), the witness should have a member of their family with them and then remove their veil. In court cases facial expression is often very telling.
What perturbed me to begin with about the choice of the "veil" as symbol is that you are not just one individual woman making an idiosyncratic choice of costume;
I am just one woman making a choice of dress. When I voice fundamentalist ideas then you may assume that is my mindset. When I come on the net and call for jihad or stoning, then you can make judgements about my thinking.
The flip side, of course, is that Muslims would not feel the need to be so hostile to the United States and our ways, if the US were not so pushy, both militarily and culturally, on other peoples.
Thank you, I am pleased you can see there are two sides to every story.