I don't know how Aquinas could be a result given the questions that quiz asked!
My dear Lunamoth, you're lambent spirituality and lucent intellect is equalled only by the luminous beauty of your person.
Actually, I answered 'at the run', as it were, allowing only a full-on yes or no (no shades of grey for me!) and came out as 100% Augustine, which suits me down to the ground, but with a strong bias towards predeterminationism, which I would of course refute.
Once my course is finished, the next question is do I learn Latin or Greek to continue my studies? I would have said Greek, as my affinity has alays been to the Greek Fathers and Platonism.
Now I'm moving towards an Arisotelian idea of the 'person' as deployed by Augustine and refined by Aquinas ... and away from the Greeks.
Interesting lecture here:
Lecture 1959
Argues that the Greeks never saw the 'person' as standing central in their disposition of being, but closer to the Buddhist view, in fact, as an accidental category, as it were ... in extreme Orthodox theology, both God and man vanish into some transcendant and apophatic distance ... Augustine laid the foundation of the idea of the person as a transcendental – which in fact suits my belief better, that 'the body' is not only
not evil, but has its place in the theophanic order and is not something we discard along the way ...
... but the really interesting idea is that the Orthodox don't like Augustine, and Latin theology generally, the doctrine of Immanence, because the Orthodox philosophical argument, on which their theology is founded, is still influenced by a transcendental Platonism.
Anyway — one of my daughters is off to Canada on Monday, for 6 months ... so I'm preparing my 'brave face' for the airport ... I bet Aquinas wouldn't have blubbed ... Augustine might have, though ....
Thomas