why you think Muslims invite you to Islam?!

Okey. I don't see it as a bad thing at all. I think you tend to be so against the idea of group identity that you tend to see a lot of what I would call neutral expressions that can be expressed in a healthy way as quite wrong. Like I said before, I think you tend toward radicalism while I tend toward a progressive, liberal or integral approach.
I guess if ethnocentrism or racism were the norm then speaking against it could be seen as radical. I see there is a difference between an active group where the individuals have made a choice, and a group where the individuals were merely branded since birth. The KKK for example holds group identity over a trait that was branded at birth. I am likewise speaking against their group identity. I am speaking against their discriminator.
 
Cyberpi,

I don't think ethnocentrism or racism are the norm, and that goes for within Judaism too! And every Jew today is a Jew-by-choice. If someone grows up and doesn't want to be Jewish they can leave Judaism. The halachic definition still stands but that says nothing of their own self-determination and identity. I see no connection between the halachic definition of a Jew and racism. It's not a closed environment and Judaism as a religion encourages tolerance for others, in many cases an appreciation for others. It does not condemn those who are not Jewish and its obligation in the treatment of non-Jews is more stringent than in the treatment of fellow Jews. In addition to the mitvah that a person should love his neighbor, there is a mitzvah to love the ger, the stranger. It acknowledges cultural differences while saying, despite that, we still need to be good to others. They are just as much b'tzelem elohim, in the image of G!d. Do you consider native american religion to also be racist? It is tribal as well.

As I see it, the labels that we apply are of value and fit within the human tendency to sort and arrange the things that surround us into categories. I do not see value in the removal of our group categorizations. I do see value in accepting and honoring the variety of categorizations on this planet. This is where I see you as a radicalist, in your assertion that categorizing and labeling itself is bad. My view is that it is a tool which can be applied both positively and negatively.
 
Hi Muslimwoman. I have a couple questions for you.

My apologies I have been away for a looooooong time.

First, your views would seem very much at variance with our friend Hado here, who unless I’m mistaken represents pretty much the Muslim mainstream. In fact, your views sound pretty radical. So what place do you find in your community, as a woman with these opinions? And how do people (especially women) with your viewpoint fare in the various Muslim communities you know about?

As a convert I find my views are at best respected and at worst tolerated because most Muslims will admit that converts take the time to learn, not only about the faith but the historical accounts too.

We fare very well indeed, not because we are women but because we study Islam and it's history. One of my favourite scholars is an elderly woman, when she speaks on tv here I find myself clapping because she wins arguments not with swords or bully tactics but with her knowledge. Most born Muslims are taught a set ideology and they never question it. People get very defensive when I speak this way here but I can always, I hope, back up what I am saying with either the Quran or historical accounts.

I don't believe it is wrong to acknowledge the truth of Islamic history, it has good and bad in it, as do all histories but I would find it very wrong to simply accept lies and repeat them as truths.

At the same time, you would appear to face the same problems as those who would rescue Jesus. Everything you know about Muhammad (pbuh) is filtered through texts shaped by tradition. Does the Quran really admit of the reading you would like to give it? When it comes to rescuing Jesus, one is in the ambiguous position of unearthing the real coin buried among the counterfeit. Overall, the text is weighted on the side of the dogmatic tradition that shaped it. Are you in a similar situation with the Quran? Or do you feel you can assimilate every word of it to your reading, and against the tradition?

Of course everything is shrouded in cultural norms and tradition, over here the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) is lifted to a status that could almost be seen as a follow on from the elevation of Jesus (pbuh) to deity.

I don't see that I read the Quran in a radical way or that I need to assimilate it "to my reading". Let us take an example, that of the status of women. The Quran is very explicit about the equality of women but with man having a degree of responsibility for them, yet as soon as the Prophet died this equality began to be eroded. Hadiths began to appear that suggested women were less valued than cattle, there is no suggestion of this in th Quran and yet it is alive and kicking today.

This is the strange thing about Islam, hadiths have survived that clearly show the equality of women but the mass population of Muslims do not read hadith or study the history of Islam. They are told by patriachal scholars of the hadiths that put women down and they accept that. When you point out the ones that provide equality for women everyone looks at you blankly and runs for their books to look it up. I have pointed a number of these out to my husband and his family and they all shrug and say they have never heard of them, it is selective teaching and has been very effective for centuries but the information is there if you take time to root it out.

Another point I would make is that I have yet to read any Muslim on a forum that is representative of the general view you hear expressed on the street. People that take time to talk on forums generally want their voice heard, they have an agenda, myself included.
 
Dream said:
Another point I would make is that I have yet to read any Muslim on a forum that is representative of the general view you hear expressed on the street. People that take time to talk on forums generally want their voice heard, they have an agenda, myself included.
Perhaps it is not so much an agenda but a calling that accounts for your presence. Look how many people are satisfied and don't feel the need to justify or quantify, but you are in a forum striving to clarify and justify and enable. How brightly you shine! What if your so-called agenda is really personal growth and how do you tell the difference?

Devadatta mentioned 'Rescuing Jesus'. I can honestly and clearly see that Jesus was no deity any more than Adam was, but this was difficult to discover because of the traditions I inherited. What an earth-quaking discovery, yet when I met some Protestants whose traditions had taught them Jesus was no deity, the knowledge of the truth of this was no indicator of which ones lived upright and which ones did not! Both good and bad were in both groups! (For me the struggle between good and evil continues as well.) Where, for me, was the benefit of all the study I went through to discover this truth when I found that knowledge determined neither happiness nor righteousness?

I recently purchased a copy of the Holy Qur'an. I bought the nice one with golden edges and many footnotes. Today I opened it and read "That He may reward out of His grace those who believe and do good. Surely He loves not the disbelievers."(30:45) Not having been steeped in Muslim tradition, I read this without context.
 
Back
Top