juantoo3
....whys guy.... ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb
That's just smurfy!
i'll tell ya'll what's "smurfy". all those friggin' male smurfs and one female smurf, with blonde hair and white summer dress with high heels. what strange customs these creaturs have!!
If an Eskimo can share his wife with a visitor, who am I to judge?
What are you doing? Every man has its right to say his own opinion on every question he wants to. Where is so lauded democracy? Does it work here?
I remember taugh political regimes have always been beginning since "get out to your own place" way. Remember communists and especially Nazi. And let me ask - isn't get out 'where it's more likely to reach a more sympathetic readership' alike what Nazi were saying to the Jews. It's unfaithful to decide whether readers like sonoman's posts or not.
Is Sonoman hypnotizing you?! Your will is safe, and you and the respective readers can decide what to believe in. Sonoman's not gentle enough? So what, gentlemen? Why should he or anyone who has his own different viewpoints stay silent? It's just unfaithful.
Sorry, if I say so straight way - my language skills aren't perfect yet, - but the common thought I find to be clear. It would be democratically and correct to leave Sonoman alone. He's got right to say what he wants. A real Christian who knows he's on true way will never change his mind because of a poster. And who finds those opinions of his logical and correct... is he guilty?
So you are the smoking bush now. far out man.I am announcing I've resurrected once again here at Easter to bring you the new Good News! contained in the Gospel of Humanity to all Abrahamic believers who are now bereft of spiritual authority with the End of Abraham with Abraham's secret Brahma identity being exposed.
Dharmaatmaa, Sonoman has fallen into the same trap as the late Jacob Bryant: trying to substitute History with Linguistics. It is like predicting the past, but the past should be read not predicted. It is an unreliable technique.Dharmaatmaa said:Sorry, if I say so straight way - my language skills aren't perfect yet, - but the common thought I find to be clear. It would be democratically and correct to leave Sonoman alone. He's got right to say what he wants. A real Christian who knows he's on true way will never change his mind because of a poster. And who finds those opinions of his logical and correct... is he guilty?
Sonoman said:I used to think there was some connection between "Hammurabi" and "Abraham" due to the consonant spelling similarities but if the Abe is Brahma theory is correct then Hammurabi would be a mythical man. Do mythical men leave steles? There has been much speculation about the Code of Hammurabi and the Mosaic Code but this Hindu roots for Abraham is from an older layer of history. I am seeing a Brahmin movement from northern India through Iran to Iraq, Assyria, Syria, all the way down south to Egypt via the Surya sun-god connection showing up in Osiris.
Nobody gets named Abraham any more.
Dharmaatmaa, Sonoman has fallen into the same trap as the late Jacob Bryant: trying to substitute History with Linguistics. It is like predicting the past, but the past should be read not predicted. It is an unreliable technique.
see Jacob Bryant His chief works were A New System or Analysis of Ancient Mythology, Observations on the Plain of Troy, and Dissertation concerning the Wars of Troy.
I don't think many in Israel or the Muslim countries would agree with you.
It is a common error to take Aristotle as superman. In this case the superman is Gene Matlock providing linguistic evidence for Sonoman's argument. Here is a quote about Mr. Matlock from Viewzone.com :"Gene has been credited with, almost single handedly, focusing historians and archaeoligists on the cultural similarities between the indigenous people of Mexico, past and present, and the ancient cultures of India and Turkey." Wow. Single-handedly! What a super guy!Holy Smoke said:No one is substituting history with linguistics here but only like many other minds before me, like Aristotle, pointing to linguistic coincidences between the Vedic sources and the later Hebrew myths of origin that are very hard to explain away as not being related at some point in time.
Just because I do not swallow the fly does not mean I am biased. It just means I am cautious and maybe preoccupied. It is all just far too reminiscent of Bryant.Holy Smoke said:Such information, because it does destroy the spiritual foundations of all the Abrahamic religions, is of course not going to be well received.