T
Tao_Equus
Guest
@ Tao
... None of this is relevant to the objections made by Dondi and myself against your argument.
That entirely depends on your mindset/wipe.
tao
@ Tao
... None of this is relevant to the objections made by Dondi and myself against your argument.
That entirely depends on your mindset/wipe.
Like I said, that entirely depends on your mindset/wipe.
tao
Post #22
You said: God can't do the math
We said: Since God created math, we're sure he can handle it.
@ Tao
Ignoring the basic flaw in your argument is not gonna make it go away.
Nothing sentient would create something so chaotic and unpredictable.
We did not invoke superstition, we applied basic logic..... like a child you invoke superstition.
@ Tao
Nothing is chaotic or unpredictable for a God who is Infinite. As Dondi has already stated: "Chaos seems to rely on unpredictability. But it only seems unpredicatable to us because we evidently aren't capable in measuring all the variables that are the sources of the cause of some event." post # 18
We did not invoke superstition, we applied basic logic.
Your argument is fundamentally flawed...
There is no Logic in invoking a superstitious belief in an infinite being for which there is no shred of evidence. Especially a being that wants us to KNOW, FEAR and RESPECT him and that expects us to follow patently cruel and contradictory commandments he gave to warlords and charlatans centuries ago. It is utter nonsense. And the only thing fundamentally flawed is the logic of people who believe such crap.
@ Tao
This has nothing to do with your original argument. Therefore, it is irrelevant.
As for the evidence for God: Remember this thread? http://www.interfaith.org/forum/proof-of-god-9794.html
Yes it has everything to do with it,
Do you also remember your failed attempts to disprove the argument?And yes I remember very well your opening thread here in which you try to assert that countless thousands of scientists are dumber than you.
No. I only remember your crass contradictions and your failure to disclose at the outset that you were yet another *yawn* muslim trying to say Muhammad knew physics better than modern science.Do you also remember your failed attempts to disprove the argument?
No. I only remember your crass contradictions and your failure to disclose at the outset that you were yet another *yawn* muslim trying to say Muhammad knew physics better than modern science.
Post #22
You said: God can't do the math
We said: Since God created math, we're sure he can handle it.
@ Tao
You failed there, just like you did here:
No I have never failed in my challenge to you to prove there is any god.
But we did not invoke God. You did. You made your entire argument dependent on God when you assumed that He would not be able to do the math required to sustain the universe. We merely pointed out that such an argument is self-contradictory as an Infinite Being would be able to handle any calculation, no matter how "chaotic" it might seem to you. You tried to show that these calculations are unmeasurable. But you failed to realize it is only unmeasurable for man. Not for God.Since you cannot prove there is a god invoking one is meaningless.
I doubt anyone on this forum can compete in that department with you Tao.And, of course, your undiminished ego.
@ Tao
Attempting to play with my words and subvert them to your own purpose is not only shallow it is underhand. But then again...as it is brainwashed into the muslim apologist I will forgive you. But you really should learn not to try and put words in peoples mouths, one day you will get a smack in the mouth for it.I thought you were trying to prove that there isnt.
But we did not invoke God. You did. You made your entire argument dependent on God when you assumed that He would not be able to do the math required to sustain the universe. We merely pointed out that such an argument is self-contradictory as an Infinite Being would be able to handle any calculation, no matter how "chaotic" it might seem to you. You tried to show that these calculations are unmeasurable. But you failed to realize it is only unmeasurable for man. Not for God.
I have said before, I know I am a self-opinionated to55er, but I have the advantage over you that I know it. That is the difference in our ego's. The other advantage I have over you is I have never been indoctrinated to hold preposterous superstitionsI doubt anyone on this forum can compete in that department with you Tao.
tao
No, your more into holding preposterous suppositions. Like this one: 'God can't handle doing the math'That is the difference in our ego's. The other advantage I have over you is I have never been indoctrinated to hold preposterous superstitions
The problem is that only you know it.I have said before, I know I am a self-opinionated to55er, but I have the advantage over you that I know it.
Moving on to physical threats now are we? Well old man, I'd be careful about dishing out such challenges... You wouldn't want to break a hip.But you really should learn not to try and put words in peoples mouths, one day you will get a smack in the mouth for it.
Was just havin some fun is all.Attempting to play with my words and subvert them to your own purpose is not only shallow it is underhand.
No my suppositions are based on observable data. That gives them 'infinitely' more credibility than the mere invocation of a jumped up tooth fairy.No, your more into holding preposterous suppositions. Like this one: 'God can't handle doing the math'
my ohh my!! so you are paranoid too!! Well do not worry poor chap, it was merely a bit of friendly advice.Moving on to physical threats now are we? Well old man, I'd be careful about dishing out such challenges... You wouldn't want to break a hip.
And you think I take you seriously? !!!Was just havin some fun is all.
No my suppositions are based on observable data.